mirror of
https://github.com/samba-team/samba.git
synced 2024-12-25 23:21:54 +03:00
tdb: cleanup: tdb_have_extra_locks() helper
In many places we check whether locks are held: add a helper to do this.
The _tdb_lockall() case has already checked for the allrecord lock, so
the extra work done by tdb_have_extra_locks() is merely redundant.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
(Imported from commit fba42f1fb4
)
(This used to be ctdb commit dda3587dfee598f387c2e696f3645486fac65052)
This commit is contained in:
parent
5f40176e88
commit
4ceb70ee37
@ -474,8 +474,8 @@ static int _tdb_lockall(struct tdb_context *tdb, int ltype,
|
||||
tdb->ecode = TDB_ERR_LOCK;
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (tdb->num_locks != 0) {
|
||||
|
||||
if (tdb_have_extra_locks(tdb)) {
|
||||
/* can't combine global and chain locks */
|
||||
tdb->ecode = TDB_ERR_LOCK;
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
@ -691,3 +691,14 @@ int tdb_unlock_record(struct tdb_context *tdb, tdb_off_t off)
|
||||
count++;
|
||||
return (count == 1 ? tdb->methods->brunlock(tdb, F_RDLCK, off, 1) : 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool tdb_have_extra_locks(struct tdb_context *tdb)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (tdb->allrecord_lock.count) {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (tdb->num_lockrecs) {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ static int tdb_reopen_internal(struct tdb_context *tdb, bool active_lock)
|
||||
return 0; /* Nothing to do. */
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (tdb->num_locks != 0 || tdb->allrecord_lock.count) {
|
||||
if (tdb_have_extra_locks(tdb)) {
|
||||
TDB_LOG((tdb, TDB_DEBUG_ERROR, "tdb_reopen: reopen not allowed with locks held\n"));
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -234,6 +234,7 @@ int tdb_brlock(struct tdb_context *tdb,
|
||||
enum tdb_lock_flags flags);
|
||||
int tdb_brunlock(struct tdb_context *tdb,
|
||||
int rw_type, tdb_off_t offset, size_t len);
|
||||
bool tdb_have_extra_locks(struct tdb_context *tdb);
|
||||
int tdb_transaction_lock(struct tdb_context *tdb, int ltype);
|
||||
int tdb_transaction_unlock(struct tdb_context *tdb, int ltype);
|
||||
int tdb_brlock_upgrade(struct tdb_context *tdb, tdb_off_t offset, size_t len);
|
||||
|
@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ int tdb_transaction_start(struct tdb_context *tdb)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (tdb->num_locks != 0 || tdb->allrecord_lock.count) {
|
||||
if (tdb_have_extra_locks(tdb)) {
|
||||
/* the caller must not have any locks when starting a
|
||||
transaction as otherwise we'll be screwed by lack
|
||||
of nested locks in posix */
|
||||
@ -950,7 +950,7 @@ static int _tdb_transaction_prepare_commit(struct tdb_context *tdb)
|
||||
|
||||
/* if there are any locks pending then the caller has not
|
||||
nested their locks properly, so fail the transaction */
|
||||
if (tdb->num_locks || tdb->allrecord_lock.count) {
|
||||
if (tdb_have_extra_locks(tdb)) {
|
||||
tdb->ecode = TDB_ERR_LOCK;
|
||||
TDB_LOG((tdb, TDB_DEBUG_ERROR, "tdb_transaction_prepare_commit: locks pending on commit\n"));
|
||||
_tdb_transaction_cancel(tdb, F_RDLCK);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user