mirror of
https://github.com/samba-team/samba.git
synced 2025-03-07 00:58:40 +03:00
s4:torture: Add test_deny1().
Creates a 2-element ALLOW + DENY ACE showing that when calculating effective permissions and maximum access already seen allow bits are not removed. BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13812 Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org> Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org> (cherry picked from commit b205d695d769e910a91bec87451dec189ec33740)
This commit is contained in:
parent
824a058aa9
commit
4fe9eff4dd
@ -1,2 +1,4 @@
|
||||
^samba3.smb2.acls.OWNER-RIGHTS-DENY1\(ad_dc\)
|
||||
^samba3.smb2.acls.OWNER-RIGHTS-DENY1\(nt4_dc\)
|
||||
^samba3.smb2.acls.DENY1\(ad_dc\)
|
||||
^samba3.smb2.acls.DENY1\(nt4_dc\)
|
||||
|
@ -2776,6 +2776,144 @@ done:
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* test that shows that a DENY ACE doesn't remove rights granted
|
||||
* by a previous ALLOW ACE.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static bool test_deny1(struct torture_context *tctx,
|
||||
struct smb2_tree *tree)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const char *fname = BASEDIR "\\test_deny1.txt";
|
||||
struct smb2_create cr;
|
||||
struct smb2_handle handle = {{0}};
|
||||
union smb_fileinfo gi;
|
||||
union smb_setfileinfo si;
|
||||
struct security_descriptor *sd_orig = NULL;
|
||||
struct security_descriptor *sd = NULL;
|
||||
const char *owner_sid = NULL;
|
||||
NTSTATUS mxac_status;
|
||||
NTSTATUS status;
|
||||
bool ret = true;
|
||||
|
||||
smb2_deltree(tree, BASEDIR);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = smb2_util_setup_dir(tctx, tree, BASEDIR);
|
||||
torture_assert_goto(tctx, ret, ret, done,
|
||||
"smb2_util_setup_dir failed\n");
|
||||
|
||||
cr = (struct smb2_create) {
|
||||
.in.desired_access = SEC_STD_READ_CONTROL |
|
||||
SEC_STD_WRITE_DAC |SEC_STD_WRITE_OWNER,
|
||||
.in.file_attributes = FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL,
|
||||
.in.share_access = NTCREATEX_SHARE_ACCESS_MASK,
|
||||
.in.create_disposition = NTCREATEX_DISP_OPEN_IF,
|
||||
.in.impersonation_level = NTCREATEX_IMPERSONATION_ANONYMOUS,
|
||||
.in.fname = fname,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
status = smb2_create(tree, tctx, &cr);
|
||||
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok_goto(tctx, status, ret, done,
|
||||
"smb2_create failed\n");
|
||||
handle = cr.out.file.handle;
|
||||
|
||||
torture_comment(tctx, "get the original sd\n");
|
||||
|
||||
gi = (union smb_fileinfo) {
|
||||
.query_secdesc.level = RAW_FILEINFO_SEC_DESC,
|
||||
.query_secdesc.in.file.handle = handle,
|
||||
.query_secdesc.in.secinfo_flags = SECINFO_DACL|SECINFO_OWNER,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
status = smb2_getinfo_file(tree, tctx, &gi);
|
||||
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok_goto(tctx, status, ret, done,
|
||||
"smb2_getinfo_file failed\n");
|
||||
|
||||
sd_orig = gi.query_secdesc.out.sd;
|
||||
owner_sid = dom_sid_string(tctx, sd_orig->owner_sid);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Add a 2 element ACL
|
||||
*
|
||||
* SEC_RIGHTS_FILE_READ|SEC_FILE_WRITE_DATA allow for owner.
|
||||
* SEC_FILE_WRITE_DATA deny for owner
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Shows on Windows that trailing DENY entries don't
|
||||
* override granted permissions.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
sd = security_descriptor_dacl_create(tctx, 0, NULL, NULL,
|
||||
owner_sid,
|
||||
SEC_ACE_TYPE_ACCESS_ALLOWED,
|
||||
SEC_RIGHTS_FILE_READ|SEC_FILE_WRITE_DATA,
|
||||
0,
|
||||
owner_sid,
|
||||
SEC_ACE_TYPE_ACCESS_DENIED,
|
||||
SEC_FILE_WRITE_DATA,
|
||||
0,
|
||||
NULL);
|
||||
torture_assert_not_null_goto(tctx, sd, ret, done,
|
||||
"SD create failed\n");
|
||||
|
||||
si = (union smb_setfileinfo) {
|
||||
.set_secdesc.level = RAW_SFILEINFO_SEC_DESC,
|
||||
.set_secdesc.in.file.handle = handle,
|
||||
.set_secdesc.in.secinfo_flags = SECINFO_DACL,
|
||||
.set_secdesc.in.sd = sd,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
status = smb2_setinfo_file(tree, &si);
|
||||
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok_goto(tctx, status, ret, done,
|
||||
"smb2_setinfo_file failed\n");
|
||||
|
||||
status = smb2_util_close(tree, handle);
|
||||
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok_goto(tctx, status, ret, done,
|
||||
"smb2_util_close failed\n");
|
||||
ZERO_STRUCT(handle);
|
||||
|
||||
cr = (struct smb2_create) {
|
||||
.in.desired_access = SEC_STD_READ_CONTROL | SEC_FILE_WRITE_DATA,
|
||||
.in.file_attributes = FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL,
|
||||
.in.share_access = NTCREATEX_SHARE_ACCESS_MASK,
|
||||
.in.create_disposition = NTCREATEX_DISP_OPEN_IF,
|
||||
.in.impersonation_level = NTCREATEX_IMPERSONATION_ANONYMOUS,
|
||||
.in.query_maximal_access = true,
|
||||
.in.fname = fname,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
status = smb2_create(tree, tctx, &cr);
|
||||
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok_goto(tctx, status, ret, done,
|
||||
"smb2_create failed\n");
|
||||
handle = cr.out.file.handle;
|
||||
|
||||
mxac_status = NT_STATUS(cr.out.maximal_access_status);
|
||||
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok_goto(tctx, mxac_status, ret, done,
|
||||
"Wrong maximum access status\n");
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* For some reasons Windows 2016 doesn't set SEC_STD_DELETE but we
|
||||
* do. Mask it out so the test passes against Samba and Windows.
|
||||
* SEC_STD_WRITE_DAC comes from being the owner.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
torture_assert_int_equal_goto(tctx,
|
||||
cr.out.maximal_access & ~SEC_STD_DELETE,
|
||||
SEC_RIGHTS_FILE_READ |
|
||||
SEC_FILE_WRITE_DATA |
|
||||
SEC_STD_WRITE_DAC,
|
||||
ret, done,
|
||||
"Wrong maximum access\n");
|
||||
|
||||
status = smb2_util_close(tree, handle);
|
||||
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok_goto(tctx, status, ret, done,
|
||||
"smb2_util_close failed\n");
|
||||
ZERO_STRUCT(handle);
|
||||
|
||||
done:
|
||||
if (!smb2_util_handle_empty(handle)) {
|
||||
smb2_util_close(tree, handle);
|
||||
}
|
||||
smb2_deltree(tree, BASEDIR);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
basic testing of SMB2 ACLs
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -2800,6 +2938,8 @@ struct torture_suite *torture_smb2_acls_init(TALLOC_CTX *ctx)
|
||||
test_owner_rights_deny);
|
||||
torture_suite_add_1smb2_test(suite, "OWNER-RIGHTS-DENY1",
|
||||
test_owner_rights_deny1);
|
||||
torture_suite_add_1smb2_test(suite, "DENY1",
|
||||
test_deny1);
|
||||
|
||||
suite->description = talloc_strdup(suite, "SMB2-ACLS tests");
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user