mirror of
https://github.com/samba-team/samba.git
synced 2024-12-27 03:21:53 +03:00
Added a few example case thingies - called Common Errors.
This commit is contained in:
John Terpstra
parent
d62d7ba46f
commit
58ed149471
@ -448,4 +448,20 @@ example of what you would not want to see would be:
|
||||
script to make Samba fit into that system.</para></note>
|
||||
</sect2>
|
||||
</sect1>
|
||||
|
||||
<sect1>
|
||||
<title>Common Errors</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
I've compiled Samba-3 from the CVS and the two binaries (smbd and nmbd)
|
||||
are very large files (40 Mg and 20 Mg). I've the same result with
|
||||
--enable-shared ?
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Answer: Strip the binaries (or dond't compile with -g).
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</sect1>
|
||||
|
||||
</chapter>
|
||||
|
||||
@ -255,6 +255,39 @@ or that suffer regular outages. Network stability and integrity are key concerns
|
||||
distributed trusted domains.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<sect2>
|
||||
<title>Tell me about Trust Relationships using Samba</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Like many, I administer multiple LANs connected together using NT trust
|
||||
relationships. This was implemented about 4 years ago. I now have the
|
||||
occasion to consider performing this same task again, but this time, I
|
||||
would like to implement it solely through samba - no Microsoft PDCs
|
||||
anywhere.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
I have read documentation on samba.org regarding NT-style trust
|
||||
relationships and am now wondering, can I do what I want to? I already
|
||||
have successfully implemented 2 samba servers, but they are not PDCs.
|
||||
They merely act as file servers. I seem to remember, and it appears to
|
||||
be true (according to samba.org) that trust relationships are a
|
||||
challenge.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Please provide any helpful feedback that you may have.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
These are almost complete in Samba 3.0 snapshots. The main catch
|
||||
is getting winbindd to be able to allocate uid/gid's for trusted
|
||||
users/groups. See the updated Samba HOWTO collection for more
|
||||
details.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</sect2>
|
||||
|
||||
</sect1>
|
||||
|
||||
</chapter>
|
||||
|
||||
@ -219,4 +219,54 @@ performance. Check the sections on the various clients in
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</sect1>
|
||||
|
||||
<sect1>
|
||||
<title>Samba performance problem due changing kernel (2.4.20 Linux kernel)</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Hi everyone. I am running Gentoo on my server and samba 2.2.8a. Recently
|
||||
I changed kernel version from linux-2.4.19-gentoo-r10 to
|
||||
linux-2.4.20-wolk4.0s. And now I have performance issue with samba. Ok
|
||||
many of you will probably say that move to vanilla sources...well I ried
|
||||
it too and it didn't work. I have 100mb LAN and two computers (linux +
|
||||
Windows2000). Linux server shares directory with DivX files, client
|
||||
(windows2000) plays them via LAN. Before when I was running 2.4.19 kernel
|
||||
everything was fine, but now movies freezes and stops...I tried moving
|
||||
files between server and Windows and it's trerribly slow.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Grab mii-tool and check the duplex settings on the NIC.
|
||||
My guess is that it is a link layer issue, not an application
|
||||
layer problem. Also run ifconfig and verify that the framing
|
||||
error, collisions, etc... look normal for ethernet.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</sect1>
|
||||
|
||||
<sect1>
|
||||
<title>Corrupt tdb Files</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<screen>
|
||||
Well today it happend.... our first major troubles using samba. This is
|
||||
no complaints but just some questions :-)
|
||||
Our samba PDC server has been hosting 3 TB of data to our 500+ users
|
||||
[Windows NT/XP] for the last 3 years using samba, no problem.
|
||||
But today all shares went SLOW; very slow. Also the main smbd kept
|
||||
spawning new processes so we had 1600+ running smbd's.... ( while
|
||||
normally we avg. 250 ).
|
||||
It crashed the SUN E3500 cluster twice. After alot of searching I
|
||||
decided to rm ./var/locks/*.tbl and YES I was happy again.
|
||||
|
||||
Q1) Is there any method of keeping the *.tbl files in top condition or
|
||||
how to early detect corruption?
|
||||
|
||||
Q2) What I also would like to mention is that the service latency seems
|
||||
alot lower then before the locks cleanup, any ideas on keeping it top notch?
|
||||
</screen>
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</sect1>
|
||||
|
||||
</chapter>
|
||||
|
||||
@ -980,6 +980,26 @@ so far:
|
||||
</para></listitem>
|
||||
</itemizedlist>
|
||||
|
||||
<scet2>
|
||||
<title>locking.trb error messages</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<screen>
|
||||
> We are seeing lots of errors in the samba logs like:
|
||||
>
|
||||
> tdb(/usr/local/samba_2.2.7/var/locks/locking.tdb): rec_read bad magic
|
||||
> 0x4d6f4b61 at offset=36116
|
||||
>
|
||||
> What do these mean?
|
||||
</screen>
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Corrupted tdb. Stop all instancesd of smbd, delete locking.tdb, restart smbd.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
</sect2>
|
||||
|
||||
</sect1>
|
||||
|
||||
<sect1>
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user