1
0
mirror of https://github.com/samba-team/samba.git synced 2025-03-20 22:50:26 +03:00

s4: smbtorture: Add multi-lock test. Regression test for bug #10684.

Bug #10684 - SMB1 blocking locks can fail notification on unlock, causing client timeout.

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10684

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <Volker.Lendecke@SerNet.DE>
This commit is contained in:
Jeremy Allison 2014-07-01 12:05:07 -07:00
parent 954401f8b2
commit 64346a134d

View File

@ -2262,6 +2262,102 @@ done:
smbcli_deltree(cli->tree, BASEDIR);
return ret;
}
/*
test multi Locking&X operation
*/
static bool test_multilock(struct torture_context *tctx,
struct smbcli_state *cli)
{
union smb_lock io;
struct smb_lock_entry lock[2];
NTSTATUS status;
bool ret = true;
int fnum;
const char *fname = BASEDIR "\\multilock_test.txt";
time_t t;
struct smbcli_request *req;
struct smbcli_session_options options;
torture_assert(tctx, torture_setup_dir(cli, BASEDIR), "Failed to setup up test directory: " BASEDIR);
lpcfg_smbcli_session_options(tctx->lp_ctx, &options);
torture_comment(tctx, "Testing LOCKING_ANDX multi-lock\n");
io.generic.level = RAW_LOCK_LOCKX;
/* Create the test file. */
fnum = smbcli_open(cli->tree, fname, O_RDWR|O_CREAT, DENY_NONE);
torture_assert(tctx,(fnum != -1), talloc_asprintf(tctx,
"Failed to create %s - %s\n",
fname, smbcli_errstr(cli->tree)));
/*
* Lock regions 100->109, 110->119 as
* two separate write locks in one request.
*/
io.lockx.level = RAW_LOCK_LOCKX;
io.lockx.in.file.fnum = fnum;
io.lockx.in.mode = LOCKING_ANDX_LARGE_FILES;
io.lockx.in.timeout = 0;
io.lockx.in.ulock_cnt = 0;
io.lockx.in.lock_cnt = 2;
io.lockx.in.mode = LOCKING_ANDX_EXCLUSIVE_LOCK;
lock[0].pid = cli->session->pid;
lock[0].offset = 100;
lock[0].count = 10;
lock[1].pid = cli->session->pid;
lock[1].offset = 120;
lock[1].count = 10;
io.lockx.in.locks = &lock[0];
status = smb_raw_lock(cli->tree, &io);
CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
/*
* Now request the same locks on a different
* context as blocking locks with infinite timeout.
*/
io.lockx.in.timeout = -1;
lock[0].pid = cli->session->pid+1;
lock[1].pid = cli->session->pid+1;
req = smb_raw_lock_send(cli->tree, &io);
torture_assert(tctx,(req != NULL), talloc_asprintf(tctx,
"Failed to setup timed locks (%s)\n", __location__));
/* Unlock lock[0] */
io.lockx.in.timeout = 0;
io.lockx.in.ulock_cnt = 1;
io.lockx.in.lock_cnt = 0;
io.lockx.in.locks = &lock[0];
lock[0].pid = cli->session->pid;
status = smb_raw_lock(cli->tree, &io);
CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
/* Start the clock. */
t = time_mono(NULL);
/* Unlock lock[1] */
io.lockx.in.timeout = 0;
io.lockx.in.ulock_cnt = 1;
io.lockx.in.lock_cnt = 0;
io.lockx.in.locks = &lock[1];
lock[1].pid = cli->session->pid;
status = smb_raw_lock(cli->tree, &io);
CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
/* receive the successful blocked lock requests */
status = smbcli_request_simple_recv(req);
CHECK_STATUS(status, NT_STATUS_OK);
/* Fail if this took more than 2 seconds. */
torture_assert(tctx,!(time_mono(NULL) > t+2), talloc_asprintf(tctx,
"Blocking locks were not granted immediately (%s)\n",
__location__));
done:
smb_raw_exit(cli->session);
smbcli_deltree(cli->tree, BASEDIR);
return ret;
}
/*
basic testing of lock calls
@ -2283,6 +2379,7 @@ struct torture_suite *torture_raw_lock(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx)
test_multiple_unlock);
torture_suite_add_1smb_test(suite, "zerobytelocks", test_zerobytelocks);
torture_suite_add_1smb_test(suite, "zerobyteread", test_zerobyteread);
torture_suite_add_1smb_test(suite, "multilock", test_multilock);
return suite;
}