mirror of
https://github.com/samba-team/samba.git
synced 2024-12-22 13:34:15 +03:00
nbt_server: Centralize a consistency check
This is a "should NEVER happen" and applies to both LOGON_PRIMARY_QUERY and LOGON_SAM_LOGON_REQUEST Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org> Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
211a6072ad
commit
7de9613385
@ -113,17 +113,10 @@ static NTSTATUS nbtd_netlogon_samlogon(
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct nbt_name *name = &packet->data.msg.dest_name;
|
||||
struct ldb_context *samctx;
|
||||
struct nbtd_interface *reply_iface = nbtd_find_reply_iface(iface, src->addr, false);
|
||||
const char *my_ip = reply_iface->ip_address;
|
||||
struct dom_sid *sid;
|
||||
struct nbt_netlogon_response *response;
|
||||
NTSTATUS status;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!my_ip) {
|
||||
DEBUG(0, ("Could not obtain own IP address for datagram socket\n"));
|
||||
return NT_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* only answer getdc requests on the PDC or LOGON names */
|
||||
if (name->type != NBT_NAME_PDC && name->type != NBT_NAME_LOGON) {
|
||||
return NT_STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED;
|
||||
@ -170,13 +163,19 @@ void nbtd_mailslot_netlogon_handler(struct dgram_mailslot_handler *dgmslot,
|
||||
NTSTATUS status = NT_STATUS_NO_MEMORY;
|
||||
struct nbtd_interface *iface =
|
||||
talloc_get_type(dgmslot->private_data, struct nbtd_interface);
|
||||
struct nbt_netlogon_packet *netlogon;
|
||||
struct nbt_netlogon_packet *netlogon = NULL;
|
||||
struct nbtd_interface *reply_iface = nbtd_find_reply_iface(
|
||||
iface, src->addr, false);
|
||||
struct nbtd_iface_name *iname;
|
||||
struct nbt_name *name = &packet->data.msg.dest_name;
|
||||
struct nbt_netlogon_response *response;
|
||||
|
||||
if (reply_iface->ip_address == NULL) {
|
||||
DBG_WARNING("Could not obtain own IP address for datagram "
|
||||
"socket\n");
|
||||
goto failed;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
netlogon = talloc(dgmslot, struct nbt_netlogon_packet);
|
||||
if (netlogon == NULL) {
|
||||
goto failed;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user