1
0
mirror of https://github.com/samba-team/samba.git synced 2024-12-22 13:34:15 +03:00

s4:torture: Fix cleanup of the secrets object in session_key test

BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12433

The test is known to be failing if sealing is turned on in some
circumstances. In this case a secret is created and then the function
dcerpc_fetch_session_key() fails. The secret is not removed!

We use torturesecret-%08x with random() to fill in the number. Sometimes
it happens that random() returns a number we already used. So we end up
trying to create a secret for an entry which already exists and run
into a collision

This change makes sure we always cleanup behind us and do not leave
secret objects we created.

Pair-Programmed-With: Guenther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>

Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Nov 17 22:30:36 CET 2016 on sn-devel-144
This commit is contained in:
Andreas Schneider 2016-11-17 16:15:54 +01:00 committed by Jeremy Allison
parent 31d21de548
commit 9de04626c0

View File

@ -34,14 +34,13 @@ static void init_lsa_String(struct lsa_String *name, const char *s)
static bool test_CreateSecret_basic(struct dcerpc_pipe *p,
struct torture_context *tctx,
struct policy_handle *handle)
struct policy_handle *handle,
struct policy_handle *sec_handle)
{
NTSTATUS status;
struct lsa_CreateSecret r;
struct lsa_SetSecret r3;
struct lsa_QuerySecret r4;
struct policy_handle sec_handle;
struct lsa_DeleteObject d;
struct lsa_DATA_BUF buf1;
struct lsa_DATA_BUF_PTR bufp1;
DATA_BLOB enc_key;
@ -61,7 +60,7 @@ static bool test_CreateSecret_basic(struct dcerpc_pipe *p,
r.in.handle = handle;
r.in.access_mask = SEC_FLAG_MAXIMUM_ALLOWED;
r.out.sec_handle = &sec_handle;
r.out.sec_handle = sec_handle;
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(tctx, dcerpc_lsa_CreateSecret_r(b, tctx, &r),
"CreateSecret failed");
@ -72,7 +71,7 @@ static bool test_CreateSecret_basic(struct dcerpc_pipe *p,
enc_key = sess_encrypt_string(secret1, &session_key);
r3.in.sec_handle = &sec_handle;
r3.in.sec_handle = sec_handle;
r3.in.new_val = &buf1;
r3.in.old_val = NULL;
r3.in.new_val->data = enc_key.data;
@ -85,7 +84,7 @@ static bool test_CreateSecret_basic(struct dcerpc_pipe *p,
"SetSecret failed");
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(tctx, r3.out.result, "SetSecret failed");
r3.in.sec_handle = &sec_handle;
r3.in.sec_handle = sec_handle;
r3.in.new_val = &buf1;
r3.in.old_val = NULL;
r3.in.new_val->data = enc_key.data;
@ -108,7 +107,7 @@ static bool test_CreateSecret_basic(struct dcerpc_pipe *p,
ZERO_STRUCT(old_mtime);
/* fetch the secret back again */
r4.in.sec_handle = &sec_handle;
r4.in.sec_handle = sec_handle;
r4.in.new_val = &bufp1;
r4.in.new_mtime = &new_mtime;
r4.in.old_val = NULL;
@ -129,11 +128,6 @@ static bool test_CreateSecret_basic(struct dcerpc_pipe *p,
torture_assert_str_equal(tctx, secret1, secret2, "Returned secret invalid");
d.in.handle = &sec_handle;
d.out.handle = &sec_handle;
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(tctx, dcerpc_lsa_DeleteObject_r(b, tctx, &d),
"DeleteObject failed");
torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(tctx, d.out.result, "delete should have returned OKINVALID_HANDLE");
return true;
}
@ -153,6 +147,8 @@ static bool test_secrets(struct torture_context *torture, const void *_data)
(const struct secret_settings *)_data;
NTSTATUS status;
struct dcerpc_binding_handle *b;
struct policy_handle sec_handle = {0};
bool ok;
lpcfg_set_cmdline(torture->lp_ctx, "ntlmssp client:keyexchange", settings->keyexchange?"True":"False");
lpcfg_set_cmdline(torture->lp_ctx, "ntlmssp_client:ntlm2", settings->ntlm2?"True":"False");
@ -180,14 +176,24 @@ static bool test_secrets(struct torture_context *torture, const void *_data)
torture_assert(torture, handle, "OpenPolicy2 failed. This test cannot run against this server");
if (!test_CreateSecret_basic(p, torture, handle)) {
talloc_free(p);
return false;
ok = test_CreateSecret_basic(p, torture, handle, &sec_handle);
if (is_valid_policy_hnd(&sec_handle)) {
struct lsa_DeleteObject d;
d.in.handle = &sec_handle;
d.out.handle = &sec_handle;
status = dcerpc_lsa_DeleteObject_r(b, torture, &d);
if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status) ||
!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(d.out.result)) {
torture_warning(torture,
"Failed to delete secrets object");
}
}
talloc_free(p);
return true;
return ok;
}
static struct torture_tcase *add_test(struct torture_suite *suite, uint32_t bindoptions,