mirror of
https://github.com/samba-team/samba.git
synced 2024-12-24 21:34:56 +03:00
dsdb-acl: Run sec_access_check_ds on each attribute proposed to modify (bug #9554 - CVE-2013-0172)
This seems inefficient, but is needed for correctness. The
alternative might be to have the sec_access_check_ds code confirm that
*all* of the nodes in the object tree have been cleared to
node->remaining_bits == 0.
Otherwise, I fear that write access to one attribute will become write
access to all attributes.
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit d776fd807e
)
This commit is contained in:
parent
b26668c606
commit
b7b91c8594
@ -977,8 +977,6 @@ static int acl_modify(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req)
|
||||
unsigned int i;
|
||||
const struct GUID *guid;
|
||||
uint32_t access_granted;
|
||||
struct object_tree *root = NULL;
|
||||
struct object_tree *new_node = NULL;
|
||||
NTSTATUS status;
|
||||
struct ldb_result *acl_res;
|
||||
struct security_descriptor *sd;
|
||||
@ -1044,12 +1042,6 @@ static int acl_modify(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req)
|
||||
"acl_modify: Error retrieving object class GUID.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
sid = samdb_result_dom_sid(req, acl_res->msgs[0], "objectSid");
|
||||
if (!insert_in_object_tree(tmp_ctx, guid, SEC_ADS_WRITE_PROP,
|
||||
&root, &new_node)) {
|
||||
talloc_free(tmp_ctx);
|
||||
return ldb_error(ldb, LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR,
|
||||
"acl_modify: Error adding new node in object tree.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
for (i=0; i < req->op.mod.message->num_elements; i++){
|
||||
const struct dsdb_attribute *attr;
|
||||
attr = dsdb_attribute_by_lDAPDisplayName(schema,
|
||||
@ -1130,6 +1122,8 @@ static int acl_modify(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req)
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
struct object_tree *root = NULL;
|
||||
struct object_tree *new_node = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
/* This basic attribute existence check with the right errorcode
|
||||
* is needed since this module is the first one which requests
|
||||
@ -1144,6 +1138,14 @@ static int acl_modify(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req)
|
||||
ret = LDB_ERR_NO_SUCH_ATTRIBUTE;
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!insert_in_object_tree(tmp_ctx, guid, SEC_ADS_WRITE_PROP,
|
||||
&root, &new_node)) {
|
||||
talloc_free(tmp_ctx);
|
||||
return ldb_error(ldb, LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR,
|
||||
"acl_modify: Error adding new node in object tree.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!insert_in_object_tree(tmp_ctx,
|
||||
&attr->attributeSecurityGUID, SEC_ADS_WRITE_PROP,
|
||||
&new_node, &new_node)) {
|
||||
@ -1160,16 +1162,12 @@ static int acl_modify(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req)
|
||||
ret = LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR;
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (root->num_of_children > 0) {
|
||||
status = sec_access_check_ds(sd, acl_user_token(module),
|
||||
SEC_ADS_WRITE_PROP,
|
||||
&access_granted,
|
||||
root,
|
||||
sid);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!NT_STATUS_IS_OK(status)) {
|
||||
ldb_asprintf_errstring(ldb_module_get_ctx(module),
|
||||
"Object %s has no write property access\n",
|
||||
@ -1183,6 +1181,7 @@ static int acl_modify(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req)
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
success:
|
||||
talloc_free(tmp_ctx);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user