mirror of
https://github.com/samba-team/samba.git
synced 2024-12-24 21:34:56 +03:00
this attempts to handle the rather bizarre lock cache semantics in
w2k. It isn't entirely accurate, but its close
(This used to be commit e02d736470
)
This commit is contained in:
parent
69b395d2c1
commit
be389e25dd
@ -285,6 +285,8 @@ NTSTATUS brl_lock(SMB_DEV_T dev, SMB_INO_T ino, int fnum,
|
|||||||
struct lock_struct lock, *locks;
|
struct lock_struct lock, *locks;
|
||||||
char *tp;
|
char *tp;
|
||||||
NTSTATUS status = NT_STATUS_OK;
|
NTSTATUS status = NT_STATUS_OK;
|
||||||
|
static int last_failed = -1;
|
||||||
|
static br_off last_failed_start;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
kbuf = locking_key(dev,ino);
|
kbuf = locking_key(dev,ino);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -348,6 +350,18 @@ NTSTATUS brl_lock(SMB_DEV_T dev, SMB_INO_T ino, int fnum,
|
|||||||
return NT_STATUS_OK;
|
return NT_STATUS_OK;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
fail:
|
fail:
|
||||||
|
/* this is a nasty hack to try to simulate the lock result cache code in w2k.
|
||||||
|
It isn't completely accurate as I haven't yet worked out the correct
|
||||||
|
semantics (tridge)
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
if (last_failed == fnum &&
|
||||||
|
last_failed_start == start &&
|
||||||
|
NT_STATUS_EQUAL(status, NT_STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED)) {
|
||||||
|
status = NT_STATUS_FILE_LOCK_CONFLICT;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
last_failed = fnum;
|
||||||
|
last_failed_start = start;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
SAFE_FREE(dbuf.dptr);
|
SAFE_FREE(dbuf.dptr);
|
||||||
tdb_chainunlock(tdb, kbuf);
|
tdb_chainunlock(tdb, kbuf);
|
||||||
return status;
|
return status;
|
||||||
|
@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ NTSTATUS do_unlock(files_struct *fsp,connection_struct *conn, uint16 lock_pid,
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
if (!ok) {
|
if (!ok) {
|
||||||
DEBUG(10,("do_unlock: returning ERRlock.\n" ));
|
DEBUG(10,("do_unlock: returning ERRlock.\n" ));
|
||||||
return NT_STATUS_LOCK_NOT_GRANTED;
|
return NT_STATUS_RANGE_NOT_LOCKED;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (!lp_posix_locking(SNUM(conn)))
|
if (!lp_posix_locking(SNUM(conn)))
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user