1
0
mirror of https://github.com/samba-team/samba.git synced 2025-02-28 01:58:17 +03:00

namepacket.c: Block SIGTERM correctly - we can only take them at defined points.

nameserv.c:		Fixup name release code - used when we are going down.
nameservreply.c:	Relaxed check for deleting name - original code never deleted.
nmbd.c:			Block SIGTERM signals most of the time - see comment on namepacket above.
Jeremy (jallison@whistle.com)
(This used to be commit 9f4e01224751134c2f7701e2aea87d06a79d77a4)
This commit is contained in:
Samba Release Account 1997-05-31 01:11:40 +00:00
parent 5c4776f496
commit d98bea900e
4 changed files with 24 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -522,7 +522,10 @@ void listen_for_packets(BOOL run_election)
timeout.tv_sec = (run_election||num_response_packets) ? 1:NMBD_SELECT_LOOP;
timeout.tv_usec = 0;
/* We can only take term signals when we are in the select. */
BlockSignals(False, SIGTERM);
selrtn = sys_select(&fds,&timeout);
BlockSignals(True, SIGTERM);
if (FD_ISSET(ClientNMB,&fds))
{

View File

@ -62,12 +62,18 @@ void remove_name_entry(struct subnet_record *d, char *name,int type, BOOL direct
a de-registration packet to the local subnet before removing the
name from its local-subnet name database. */
int search = FIND_SELF;
struct name_record n;
struct name_record *n2=NULL;
make_nmb_name(&n.name,name,type,scope);
if ((n2 = find_name_search(&d, &n.name, FIND_SELF, ipzero)))
if(d == wins_subnet)
search |= FIND_WINS;
else
search |= FIND_LOCAL;
if ((n2 = find_name_search(&d, &n.name, search, ipzero)))
{
/* check name isn't already being de-registered */
if (NAME_DEREG(n2->ip_flgs[0].nb_flags))
@ -79,6 +85,14 @@ void remove_name_entry(struct subnet_record *d, char *name,int type, BOOL direct
if (!n2) return;
/* Only remove names with non-zero death times. */
if(n2->death_time == 0)
{
DEBUG(5,("remove_name_entry: Name %s(%d) has zero ttl - not removing.\n",
name, type));
return;
}
/* remove the name immediately. even if the spec says we should
first try to release them, this is too dangerous with our current
name structures as otherwise we will end up replying to names we

View File

@ -135,10 +135,13 @@ void reply_name_release(struct packet_struct *p)
search, ip);
/* XXXX under what conditions should we reject the removal?? */
if (n && n->ip_flgs[0].nb_flags == nb_flags)
/* For now - remove if the names match and the group bit matches. */
if (n && (NAME_GROUP(n->ip_flgs[0].nb_flags) == NAME_GROUP(nb_flags)))
{
success = True;
DEBUG(5, ("reply_name_release: Removing name %s on subnet %s\n",
namestr(&nmb->question.question_name), inet_ntoa(d->bcast_ip)));
remove_name(d,n);
n = NULL;
}

View File

@ -571,6 +571,8 @@ static void usage(char *pname)
DEBUG(3,("Dumped names\n"));
/* We can only take sigterm signals in the select. */
BlockSignals(True,SIGTERM);
process();
close_sockets();