mirror of
https://github.com/samba-team/samba.git
synced 2025-01-11 05:18:09 +03:00
s4:ldapsrv Place the 'privilaged' ldapi socket under an #ifdef
This makes it clear to our users that this particular implementation isn't final (all parties are agreed that an EXTERNAL bind is the right way to do this, but it has not been implemented yet). Andrew Bartlett
This commit is contained in:
parent
5c19c60c57
commit
dcc9ae6995
@ -455,6 +455,10 @@ static const struct stream_server_ops ldap_stream_nonpriv_ops = {
|
||||
.send_handler = ldapsrv_send,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/* The feature removed behind an #ifdef until we can do it properly
|
||||
* with an EXTERNAL bind. */
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef WITH_LDAPI_PRIV_SOCKET
|
||||
static void ldapsrv_accept_priv(struct stream_connection *c)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct ldapsrv_service *ldapsrv_service = talloc_get_type_abort(
|
||||
@ -479,6 +483,7 @@ static const struct stream_server_ops ldap_stream_priv_ops = {
|
||||
.send_handler = ldapsrv_send,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
/*
|
||||
add a socket address to the list of events, one event per port
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -549,7 +554,10 @@ static NTSTATUS add_socket(struct tevent_context *event_context,
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void ldapsrv_task_init(struct task_server *task)
|
||||
{
|
||||
char *ldapi_path, *priv_dir;
|
||||
char *ldapi_path;
|
||||
#ifdef WITH_LDAPI_PRIV_SOCKET
|
||||
char *priv_dir;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
struct ldapsrv_service *ldap_service;
|
||||
NTSTATUS status;
|
||||
const struct model_ops *model_ops;
|
||||
@ -619,6 +627,7 @@ static void ldapsrv_task_init(struct task_server *task)
|
||||
ldapi_path, nt_errstr(status)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef WITH_LDAPI_PRIV_SOCKET
|
||||
priv_dir = private_path(ldap_service, task->lp_ctx, "ldap_priv");
|
||||
if (priv_dir == NULL) {
|
||||
goto failed;
|
||||
@ -649,6 +658,7 @@ static void ldapsrv_task_init(struct task_server *task)
|
||||
ldapi_path, nt_errstr(status)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
failed:
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user