From e7b6ea46532a26611dfd9d9e2727d52ba6a9cf50 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeremy Allison Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:08:39 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Fix up the comments on security=share to explain we're ignoring passwords. Jeremy. --- source/smbd/sesssetup.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/source/smbd/sesssetup.c b/source/smbd/sesssetup.c index cf90c7183a2..e0739ef992a 100644 --- a/source/smbd/sesssetup.c +++ b/source/smbd/sesssetup.c @@ -1534,6 +1534,10 @@ void reply_sesssetup_and_X(struct smb_request *req) lm_resp = data_blob(p, passlen1); nt_resp = data_blob(p+passlen1, passlen2); } else if (lp_security() != SEC_SHARE) { + /* + * In share level we should ignore any passwords, so + * only read them if we're not. + */ char *pass = NULL; bool unic= smb_flag2 & FLAGS2_UNICODE_STRINGS; @@ -1636,7 +1640,7 @@ void reply_sesssetup_and_X(struct smb_request *req) reload_services(True); if (lp_security() == SEC_SHARE) { - /* in share level we should ignore any passwords */ + /* In share level we should ignore any passwords */ data_blob_free(&lm_resp); data_blob_free(&nt_resp);