IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The rpcecho server is useful in development and testing, but should never
have been allowed into production, as it includes the facility to
do a blocking sleep() in the single-threaded rpc worker.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15474
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This makes LDAP_DIRSYNC_OBJECT_SECURITY the only behaviour provided by
Samba.
Having a second access control system withing the LDAP stack is unsafe
and this layer is incomplete.
The current system gives all accounts that have been given the
GUID_DRS_GET_CHANGES extended right SYSTEM access. Currently in Samba
this equates to full access to passwords as well as "RODC Filtered
attributes" (often used with confidential attributes).
Rather than attempting to correctly filter for secrets (passwords) and
these filtered attributes, as well as preventing search expressions for
both, we leave this complexity to the acl_read module which has this
facility already well tested.
The implication is that callers will only see and filter by attribute
in DirSync that they could without DirSync.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
The aim here is to document the expected (even if not implemented)
SEARCH_FLAG_RODC_ATTRIBUTE vs SEARCH_FLAG_CONFIDENTIAL, behaviour, so
that any change once CVE-2023-4154 is fixed can be noted.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
SEARCH_FLAG_RODC_ATTRIBUTE should be like SEARCH_FLAG_CONFIDENTIAL,
but for DirSync and DRS replication. Accounts with
GUID_DRS_GET_CHANGES rights should not be able to read this
attribute.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
When we (expect to) get back a result, do not waste time against a potentially
slow server confirming we also get back results for all the other attribute
combinations.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Rather than fail, if the last run failed to reset things, just force
the DC into the required state.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
To re-use setup code, the super-class must have no test_*() methods
otherwise these will be run as well as the class-local tests.
We rename tests that would otherwise have duplicate names
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
(cherry picked from commit 9ea06aaf9f)
It's no longer used anywhere.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 8b4e6f7b3f)
Use more specific unittest methods, and remove unused code.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 2e5d08c908)
The confidential_attrs test no longer uses DC_MODE_RETURN_NONE we can now
remove the complexity.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
(cherry picked from commit 82d2ec786f)
Exported security_descriptor_sacl_del and security_descriptor_dacl_del as new methods of the
security descriptor class to python.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15424
Signed-off-by: Christian Merten <christian@merten.dev>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 84a54d2fa2)
We send the NC root first, as a special case for every chunk
that we send until the natural point where it belongs.
We do not bump the tmp_highest_usn in the highwatermark that
the client and server use (it is meant to be an opauqe cookie)
until the 'natural' point where the object appears, similar
to the cache for GET_ANC.
The issue is that without this, because the NC root was sorted
first in whatever chunk it appeared in but could have a 'high'
highwatermark, Azure AD Connect will send back the same
new_highwatermark->tmp_highest_usn, and due to a bug,
a zero reserved_usn, which makes Samba discard it.
The reserved_usn is now much less likely to ever be set because
the tmp_higest_usn is now always advancing.
RN: Avoid infinite loop in initial user sync with Azure AD Connect
when synchronising a large Samba AD domain.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15401
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 79ca6ef28a)
Autobuild-User(v4-17-test): Jule Anger <janger@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(v4-17-test): Mon Aug 21 08:42:32 UTC 2023 on sn-devel-184
This is closer to our READDME.Coding style
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15401
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 2aba9e230e)
Because of the requirement to echo back the original string, we can
not force this to be a trustworthy value.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15401
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 2ed9815eea)
This tries to avoid it appearing that ncRoot is a value that can
be trusted and used internally by not updating it and instead leaving
it just as an input/echo-back value.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15401
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 548f141f11)
This avoids the indentation correction being in the previous patch.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15401
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit fe7418e176)
This changes the GetNCChanges server to use a per-call state for
extended operations like RID_ALLOC or REPL_OBJ and only maintain
and (more importantly) invalidate the state during normal replication.
This allows REPL_OBJ to be called during a normal replication cycle
that continues using after that call, continuing with the same
highwatermark cookie.
Azure AD will do a sequence of (roughly)
* Normal replication (objects 1..100)
* REPL_OBJ (of 1 object)
* Normal replication (objects 101..200)
However, if there are more than 100 (in this example) objects in the
domain, and the second replication is required, the objects 1..100
are sent, as the replication state was invalidated by the REPL_OBJ call.
RN: Improve GetNChanges to address some (but not all "Azure AD Connect")
syncronisation tool looping during the initial user sync phase.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15401
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 99579e7063)
The NC root, on any replication when it appears, is the first object to be
replicated, including for all subsequent chunks in the replication.
However the tmp_highest_usn is not updated by that USN, it must
only be updated for the non-NC changes (to match Windows exactly),
or at least only updated with the non-NC changes until it would
naturally appear.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15401
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 8741495521)
This demonstrates the behaviour used by the "Azure AD Connect" cloud sync tool.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15401
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit b323169d6f)
Azure AD Connect will send a GUID but no DummyDN.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15401
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit db16366b0b)
It is always better to keep the testing OUs unique if possible.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15401
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 628eab11b3)
This object is used to hold one of many possible connections and
it is helpful for debugging and uniqueness to know which DC is being
connected to.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15401
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit c30bb8769f)
This check was valuable before aee2039e63
but now only checks things we know to be true, as the value has come
from Samba via drs_ObjectIdentifier_to_dn_and_nc_root() either on this
or a previous call.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15401
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 0550e469ed)
At this layer we can make a reasonable assumption about being able
to read ldb_errstring() to print that for extra useful debugging.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15401
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 63843a22c8)
This is still unreachable, so but improve the logging
to give more detail in this area anyway.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15401
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit d0c1ce53ad)
This demonstrates the race quite easily against
Samba and works fine against Windows Server 2022.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15346
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 4028d65829)
We already don't allow setting max_credits in the sync wrapper, so
omit the contexts there as well.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Aug 26 19:54:03 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15346
(cherry picked from commit 4ddd277c0b)
The PDUs were generated by Windows clients.
And we fail to parse them currently.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15446
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit c37adb7626)
This is now exactly the same actions, but just uses common code to do it.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9959
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 4250d07e4d)
This is now exactly the same actions, but just uses common code to do it.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9959
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 9b4f3f3cb4)
This is now exactly the same actions, but just uses common code to do it.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9959
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 13eed1e0e7)
This is now exactly the same actions, but just uses common code to do it.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9959
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit a900f6aa5d)
This is now exactly the same actions, but just uses common code to do it.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9959
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 4e18066fa2)
By doing this we use the common samdb_get_system_container_dn() routine and we
avoid doing a linerize and parse step on the main DN, instead using the
already stored parse of the DN. This is more hygenic.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9959
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 3669caa97f)
This will replace many calls crafting or searching for this DN
elsewhere in the code.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9959
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 25b0e1102e)
