IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
krb5_free_error() is availalbe in MIT and Heimdal. Both implementations
free the contents and the pointer. krb5_free_data_contents() is Heimdal
only. Which function you need to call depends.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
When "ignore system acls" is set to "yes, we need to ensure filesystem
permission always grant access so that when doing our own access checks
we don't run into situations where we grant access but the filesystem
doesn't.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12181
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Aug 31 18:41:20 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
LDB_UNPACK_DATA_FLAG_NO_VALUES_ALLOC allows us to consolidate some of these allocations
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Autobuild-User(master): Douglas Bagnall <dbagnall@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Aug 31 10:53:09 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
With a binary search, this can only be tested on 3+ elements.
Pair-programmed-with: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Bob Campbell <bobcampbell@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Garming Sam <garming@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Aug 25 14:22:25 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
This has an odd behaviour where PartialAttrSetEx does not respect the
incoming mapping. PartialAttrSetEx is not respected in Samba at all.
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
On Windows this does not seem to fail, but causes silent errors.
Pair-programmed-with: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Bob Campbell <bobcampbell@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This will cause silent errors in the translation, but as far as we know,
Windows will accept it just fine.
Pair-programmed-with: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Bob Campbell <bobcampbell@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Pair-Programmed-With: Guenther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Aug 23 05:00:13 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
Add tests that show copychunk behavior when the
source and dest handles have execute right instead
of read-data right.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12149
Signed-off-by: Uri Simchoni <uri@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Separate file creation (which requires write access) from the
opening of the file for the test (which might be without write
access).
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12149
Signed-off-by: Uri Simchoni <uri@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
This test (passes against Windows Server 2012R2) shows
that the implicit FILE_READ_DATA that is added whenever
FILE_EXECUTE is granted, is not reported back when querying
the handle.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12149
Signed-off-by: Uri Simchoni <uri@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Add functions which create a file or a directory with
specific desired access.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12149
Signed-off-by: Uri Simchoni <uri@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
We also take the chance to make it clearer that the number
being passed in should be unique.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12128
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
It's perfectly valid to replicate from a partner with an older schema
version, otherwise schema changes would block any other replication
until every dc in the forest has the schema changes.
The avoids an endless loop trying to get schema in sync with the partner.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12115
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This will simplify the schema checking in future.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12115
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This tests for a possible deadlock between smbd and ctdb dealing with
ctdb tombstone records.
Commit 925625b52886d40b50fc631bad8bdc81970f7598 explains the deadlock in
more details and contains the fix. It's a fix for a regression
introduced by the patch for bug 10008 (1cae59ce112c).
If you ever want to use this test against that specific commit:
$ git checkout 925625b52886d40b50fc631bad8bdc81970f7598
$ git cherry-pick THIS_COMMIT
This should not deadlock on a ctdb cluster.
$ git revert 925625b52886d40b50fc631bad8bdc81970f7598
This will deadlock.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12005
Pair-Programmed-With: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
This allows us to generate better assert messages and give the
developer some ideas why the command wasn't able to run.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12108
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
This is from cea4a4b9b22c78f9736e2290d302a88644db4031 and
613d085a63ee554084cb99d2150921dd108f6b77
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12107
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Aug 3 21:43:21 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
The use of the wrong key can still create structures that parse as a SID,
therefore we can sometimes get an unusual error, which becomes a flapping test
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12107
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This function allows us to control allocation of memory during parse
of the packed ldb data.
This in turn can have an important performance impact as each
small allocation can have a large overhead
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
This test only covers the forward link case.
NOTE: We can't confirm this against Windows because they prevent us from
modifying the schema for the schema classes.
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Prior to this, none of the linked attributes would be checked for their
ids.
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Guenther
Signed-off-by: Guenther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Jul 23 09:50:46 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
We validate everything except the whole LOGON_INFO structure,
we even decrypt the PAC_CREDENTIALS_INFO blob and verify
PAC_CREDENTIAL_DATA_NDR and PAC_CREDENTIAL_NTLM_SECPKG.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Jul 21 01:07:28 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
This is included because this sample helped us addres issues in the previous attempt at
handling PAC_UPN_DNS_INFO correctly, and I have Tris's permission to include this in our
tests.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This one nicely demonstrates that the strings are really non-null terminated.
Guenther
Signed-off-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Someone changed the PAC buffer union without adding proper tests, now we
sometimes fail to parse the PAC completely due to that...
Guenther
Signed-off-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This coveres the case without AES keys, and before the IDL was changed for SambaGPG support
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
From the mail to dochelp:
I've also got cases (where I created an account with
UF_NORMAL_ACCOUNT|UF_ACCOUNTDISABLE|UF_SMARTCARD_REQUIRED
in the LDAP add) with the following strange blobs:
One time:
[0000] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
and once:
[0000] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 53
The original issue I reported was the following, a user was created
with a password and then userAccountControl was changed to
UF_NORMAL_ACCOUNT|UF_SMARTCARD_REQUIRED. In that case I'm getting:
[0000] 00 00 00 00 62 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 20 00 20 00
[0010] 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00
[0020] 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00
[0030] 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00
[0040] 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00
[0050] 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00
[0060] 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00 20 00 50 00 30
As you see the last byte (unknown3) is always different on Windows,
but always 0x00 from Samba, so I used 0x00 in order to allow the
test to pass.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Hoping the new name is not as confusing as the old name.
Guenther
Signed-off-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Rather than just disabling inbound replication, consider that there may be another server
in the test network, and ensure we do not replicate to or from it either.
replica_sync.py is omitted, as it tests some more subtle variations
of the DISABLE_INBOUND_REPL flag.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
We add the forced flag, so that we can leave replication otherwise disabled
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
