IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
them with malloc'ing accessor functions. Should save a
lot of static space :-).
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit 52dc5eaef2106015b3a8b659e818bdb15ad94b05)
to merge it to 4_0. I want it in 3_0 because it took a bit to persuade myself
that el can not be NULL here.
Volker
(This used to be commit c0c035b1c8b9d80cd205cde16ad3e838e2d44459)
remove wrong check and statement.
to manipulate rootDSE we use ldb_dn_new() as base and that has 0 elements.
metze
(This used to be commit b81cae4180452d2a14c445392fd828032e6eddec)
add ldb_set_create_perms() function to set the create_perms after
ldb_init() and before ldb_connect()
metze
(This used to be commit dd9d469eef337954b6aee4c86ac0691f52812456)
It would be nice if someone can merge that to samba4,
otherwise I'll merge that to samba4 on monday
metze
(This used to be commit 6bc42f31ce294f2bd50ffbd536e1ee42607ef799)
- passing mem_ctx as ldb_context is a bad idea!
- naming a static function talloc_ is also bad and misleading
metze
(This used to be commit 0523ad249335c6094854bc9cefb46e2095f4c0ba)
I have some problems resolving the last 3 ones in attrib_handlers.c. In line
251 the function ldb_dn_explode_casefold is called with mem_ctx as the first
argument. Looking at ldb_dn_explode_casefold I see that the first argument it
expects is a struct ldb_context. I could certainly add a cast to (struct
ldb_context *) to that call, but I would assume that this is the wrong fix. Is
it possible that attrib_handlers.c:251 and :254 should have ldb and not
mem_ctx as the first argument?
Can anybody from Samba4 clarify this for me and apply the correct fix?
Thanks a lot.
Volker
(This used to be commit 26f2cb71ebf00b2c6f356da5f32384f7fa083521)
Samba4 smbd force the umask to 0, which meant we ended up with ldb
being world writable.
This isn't really an ideal fix, as it means ldb no longer honors umask
(as it should do, like all good libraries).
Unfortunately the 'proper' fix is too complex for now
this also merges a tiny code style fix from s4 to s3
(This used to be commit dd8ec8725f168f4286bbfc00d69cd56089ba3543)
string is zero length. This allows callers to not have to worry about
creating an invalid ldap attribute.
See extensive discussion on samba-technical list :-)
(This used to be commit 9e66df05a4df3d3c7b02048d80e2661103d1d40a)
code. Yay!
This first commit copies lib/ldb/ from Samba4. A huge congratulations
should go to Simo on this - he has put an enormous amount of work into
ldb, and it's great to see it go into the Samba3 tree.
(This used to be commit bbedf2e34315f5c420a3a05dfe22b1d5cf79f042)
