IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This reverts commit a6ae7a552f851a399991262377cc0e062e40ac20.
This fixes bug #7222 (All users have full rigths on all shares) (CVE-2010-0728).
(cherry picked from commit 1c9494c76cc9686c61e0966f38528d3318f3176f)
This patch removes all of the files from the samba tree that should now
be provided by the cifs-utils package. It also drops a
"README.cifs-utils" into the topdir with a URL to the main cifs-utils
webpage. This is for people who don't want the lists and might be taken
by surprise by the change. That's optional, but I think it's a good idea
for a least a release or two.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@samba.org>
cross-device rename support has some major limitations:
- on huge files clients will timeout or hang
- ACLs and EA information is not retained
Usually a client will have to handle this. A Windows Server with a reparse
point will also just return NT_STATUS_NOT_SAME_DEVICE. We will now by default
do the same.
I will add a vfs module which will restore the old cross-device renames.
Now that cifs-utils are their own project, we need to go ahead and pull
them out of the samba tree. This patch represents the first step toward
that end.
Remove the cifs-utilities from the source3 and source4 builds. Please
pay particular attention to the source4 piece. I'm not at all familiar
with the build system there, and would appreciate someone sanity
checking my changes.
It also adds a small README.cifs-utils file in the topdir. This is
optional, but I think it's a good idea to carry this for a release or
two.
Once this patch looks ok, I'll plan to do another patch to actually
remove the client dir and the relevant docs-xml files from the tree
altogether.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To count LDB objects use variables of type "unsigned (int)" or "long long int"
on binary or downto searches.
To count characters in strings use "size_t".
To calculate differences between pointers use "ptrdiff_t".
I used "unsigned int" counters where we count LDB objects (LDB specification
prescribes to use "unsigned" index variables).
But on DSDB replication object counters I used "uint32_t" typed variables as it
is suggested.
If a counter variable counts both types of objects I used "unsigned int" since
size(unsigned int) >= size(uint32_t), but on most platforms equal.
Counters which are used in the way "for (i = 0; array[i] != NULL; i++)" I
modified to "unsigned" since for sure we don't want to have negative array
indexes there.
Counters which are used in the way "for (i = 0; array[i] != NULL; i++)" I
modified to "unsigned" since for sure we don't want to have negative array
indexes there.
There were many counter variables typed "uint32_t". This isn't fully correct
since those count LDB objects. The amount is saved in a "num_*" variable which
is "unsigned" without a bitlength specification. Therefore change also these
counters to be plain "unsigned".
