IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
If the client is not able to receive the results within connections idle
time, then we should treat it as dead. It's value is 15 minutes (900 s)
by default.
In order to limit that further an admin can use 'socket options'
and set TCP_KEEPCNT, TCP_KEEPIDLE, TCP_KEEPINTVL and/or TCP_USER_TIMEOUT
to useful values.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15202
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Oct 19 17:13:39 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
popt1.19 fixes a leak that exposes a use as free,
make sure we duplicate return of poptGetArg if
poptFreeContext is called before we use it.
==6357== Command: ./bin/regpatch file
==6357==
Can't load /home/npower/samba-back/INSTALL_DIR/etc/smb.conf - run testparm to debug it
==6357== Syscall param openat(filename) points to unaddressable byte(s)
==6357== at 0x4BFE535: open (in /usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
==6357== by 0x4861432: reg_diff_load (patchfile.c:345)
==6357== by 0x4861CD3: reg_diff_apply (patchfile.c:542)
==6357== by 0x10ADF9: main (regpatch.c:114)
==6357== Address 0x70f79d0 is 0 bytes inside a block of size 5 free'd
==6357== at 0x484617B: free (in /usr/libexec/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==6357== by 0x4AF38B8: poptResetContext (in /usr/lib64/libpopt.so.0.0.2)
==6357== by 0x4AF45D4: poptFreeContext (in /usr/lib64/libpopt.so.0.0.2)
==6357== by 0x10ADCF: main (regpatch.c:111)
==6357== Block was alloc'd at
==6357== at 0x48437B4: malloc (in /usr/libexec/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==6357== by 0x4AF52EE: poptGetNextOpt (in /usr/lib64/libpopt.so.0.0.2)
==6357== by 0x10ACBD: main (regpatch.c:79)
==6357==
==6357== Invalid read of size 1
==6357== at 0x4849782: strlen (in /usr/libexec/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==6357== by 0x4B5D50F: __vfprintf_internal (in /usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
==6357== by 0x4B7E719: __vasprintf_internal (in /usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
==6357== by 0x4AD32F0: __dbgtext_va (debug.c:1904)
==6357== by 0x4AD33F2: dbgtext (debug.c:1925)
==6357== by 0x4861515: reg_diff_load (patchfile.c:353)
==6357== by 0x4861CD3: reg_diff_apply (patchfile.c:542)
==6357== by 0x10ADF9: main (regpatch.c:114)
==6357== Address 0x70f79d0 is 0 bytes inside a block of size 5 free'd
==6357== at 0x484617B: free (in /usr/libexec/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==6357== by 0x4AF38B8: poptResetContext (in /usr/lib64/libpopt.so.0.0.2)
==6357== by 0x4AF45D4: poptFreeContext (in /usr/lib64/libpopt.so.0.0.2)
==6357== by 0x10ADCF: main (regpatch.c:111)
==6357== Block was alloc'd at
==6357== at 0x48437B4: malloc (in /usr/libexec/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==6357== by 0x4AF52EE: poptGetNextOpt (in /usr/lib64/libpopt.so.0.0.2)
==6357== by 0x10ACBD: main (regpatch.c:79)
==6357==
==6357== Invalid read of size 1
==6357== at 0x4849794: strlen (in /usr/libexec/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==6357== by 0x4B5D50F: __vfprintf_internal (in /usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
==6357== by 0x4B7E719: __vasprintf_internal (in /usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
==6357== by 0x4AD32F0: __dbgtext_va (debug.c:1904)
==6357== by 0x4AD33F2: dbgtext (debug.c:1925)
==6357== by 0x4861515: reg_diff_load (patchfile.c:353)
==6357== by 0x4861CD3: reg_diff_apply (patchfile.c:542)
==6357== by 0x10ADF9: main (regpatch.c:114)
==6357== Address 0x70f79d1 is 1 bytes inside a block of size 5 free'd
==6357== at 0x484617B: free (in /usr/libexec/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==6357== by 0x4AF38B8: poptResetContext (in /usr/lib64/libpopt.so.0.0.2)
==6357== by 0x4AF45D4: poptFreeContext (in /usr/lib64/libpopt.so.0.0.2)
==6357== by 0x10ADCF: main (regpatch.c:111)
==6357== Block was alloc'd at
==6357== at 0x48437B4: malloc (in /usr/libexec/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==6357== by 0x4AF52EE: poptGetNextOpt (in /usr/lib64/libpopt.so.0.0.2)
==6357== by 0x10ACBD: main (regpatch.c:79)
==6357==
==6357== Invalid read of size 1
==6357== at 0x4B83DD0: _IO_default_xsputn (in /usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
==6357== by 0x4B5D39E: __vfprintf_internal (in /usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
==6357== by 0x4B7E719: __vasprintf_internal (in /usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
==6357== by 0x4AD32F0: __dbgtext_va (debug.c:1904)
==6357== by 0x4AD33F2: dbgtext (debug.c:1925)
==6357== by 0x4861515: reg_diff_load (patchfile.c:353)
==6357== by 0x4861CD3: reg_diff_apply (patchfile.c:542)
==6357== by 0x10ADF9: main (regpatch.c:114)
==6357== Address 0x70f79d0 is 0 bytes inside a block of size 5 free'd
==6357== at 0x484617B: free (in /usr/libexec/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==6357== by 0x4AF38B8: poptResetContext (in /usr/lib64/libpopt.so.0.0.2)
==6357== by 0x4AF45D4: poptFreeContext (in /usr/lib64/libpopt.so.0.0.2)
==6357== by 0x10ADCF: main (regpatch.c:111)
==6357== Block was alloc'd at
==6357== at 0x48437B4: malloc (in /usr/libexec/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==6357== by 0x4AF52EE: poptGetNextOpt (in /usr/lib64/libpopt.so.0.0.2)
==6357== by 0x10ACBD: main (regpatch.c:79)
==6357==
==6357== Invalid read of size 1
==6357== at 0x4B83DDF: _IO_default_xsputn (in /usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
==6357== by 0x4B5D39E: __vfprintf_internal (in /usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
==6357== by 0x4B7E719: __vasprintf_internal (in /usr/lib64/libc.so.6)
==6357== by 0x4AD32F0: __dbgtext_va (debug.c:1904)
==6357== by 0x4AD33F2: dbgtext (debug.c:1925)
==6357== by 0x4861515: reg_diff_load (patchfile.c:353)
==6357== by 0x4861CD3: reg_diff_apply (patchfile.c:542)
==6357== by 0x10ADF9: main (regpatch.c:114)
==6357== Address 0x70f79d2 is 2 bytes inside a block of size 5 free'd
==6357== at 0x484617B: free (in /usr/libexec/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==6357== by 0x4AF38B8: poptResetContext (in /usr/lib64/libpopt.so.0.0.2)
==6357== by 0x4AF45D4: poptFreeContext (in /usr/lib64/libpopt.so.0.0.2)
==6357== by 0x10ADCF: main (regpatch.c:111)
==6357== Block was alloc'd at
==6357== at 0x48437B4: malloc (in /usr/libexec/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==6357== by 0x4AF52EE: poptGetNextOpt (in /usr/lib64/libpopt.so.0.0.2)
==6357== by 0x10ACBD: main (regpatch.c:79)
==6357==
Error reading registry patch file `file'
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15205
Signed-off-by: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Oct 14 13:38:55 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
imessaging_client_init() is for temporary stuff only, so we should drop
(unexpected) incoming messages unless we expect irpc responses.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15201
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Oct 13 13:32:30 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
We often create imessaging contexts just for sending messages,
but we'll never process incoming messages because a temporary event
context was used and we just queue a lot of imessaging_post_state
structures with immediate events.
With imessaging_init_discard_incoming() we'll discard any incoming messages
unless we have pending irpc requests.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15201
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
This shows we currently hang when sending an SMB2_OP_FLUSH on
an AFP_Resource fork.
Adds knownfail.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15182
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Heimdal's 'data->length > 0' assertion in krb5_pac_add_buffer() is gone
as of f33f73f82fb2d5d96928ce5910e2d0d939c2ff57, so we no longer need to
specify a non-zero length.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This function is longwinded and needlessly allocates intermediary
buffers. Simplify it.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We don't need the local configuration here.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This helps explain these better than WERR_GEN_FAILURE.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15189
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
This emulates older verions of Samba that fail to implement
DRSUAPI_DRS_GET_ANC correctly and totally fails to support
DRSUAPI_DRS_GET_TGT.
This will allow testing of a client-side fallback, allowing migration
from sites that run very old Samba versions over DRSUAPI (currently
the only option is to attempt an in-place upgrade).
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15189
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
This test, compared with the direct to RPC tests, will succeed, then fail once the
server is changed to emulate Samba 4.5 and and again succeed once the python code
changes to allow skipping the DRSUAPI_DRS_CRITICAL_ONLY step
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15189
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
The chgdcpass environment will emulate older verions of Samba
that fail to implement DRSUAPI_DRS_GET_ANC correctly and
totally fails to support DRSUAPI_DRS_GET_TGT.
This will allow testing of a client-side fallback, allowing migration
from sites that run very old Samba versions over DRSUAPI (currently
the only option is to attempt an in-place upgrade).
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15189
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Added sddl_encode_ace as new method as_sddl to security_ace class in python.
Signed-off-by: Christian Merten <christian@merten.dev>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Patched security_ace with a richcmp function given by
security_ace_equal.
Signed-off-by: Christian Merten <christian@merten.dev>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Exported security_descriptor_sacl_del and security_descriptor_dacl_del as new methods of the
security descriptor class to python.
Signed-off-by: Christian Merten <christian@merten.dev>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Sep 16 06:47:43 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
leaving the carefully constructed verbosity there for whoever choses
to switch it on.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
It is strange that sDRightsEffective pays no attention to the
dSHeuristics flags.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14810
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Sep 16 03:31:42 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
The implicit right of an object's owner to modify its security
descriptor no longer exists, according to the new access rules. However,
we continue to grant this implicit right for fileserver access checks.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14810
Signed-off-by: Nadezhda Ivanova <nivanova@symas.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
se_access_check() will be changed in a following commit to remove the
implicit WRITE_DAC right that comes with being the owner of an object.
We want to keep this implicit right for file access, and by using
se_file_access_check() we can preserve the existing behaviour.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14810
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Test using non-priviledged accounts now need to make sure they have
WP access on the prvided attributes, or Write-DACL
Some test create organizational units with a specific SD, and those now
need the user to have WD or else they give errors
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14810
Signed-off-by: Nadezhda Ivanova <nivanova@symas.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Up to now, the rights to modify an attribute were not checked during an LDAP
add operation. This means that even if a user has no right to modify
an attribute, they can still specify any value during object creation,
and the validated writes were not checked.
This patch changes this behavior. During an add operation,
a security descriptor is created that does not include the one provided by the
user, and is used to verify that the user has the right to modify the supplied attributes.
Exception is made for an object's mandatory attributes, and if the user has Write DACL right,
further checks are skipped.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14810
Pair-Programmed-With: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Nadezhda Ivanova <nivanova@symas.com>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This allows us to make use of it in acl_add().
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14810
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Up to now, the rights to modify an attribute were not checked during an LDAP
add operation. This means that even if a user has no right to modify
an attribute, they can still specify any value during object creation,
and the validated writes were not checked.
This patch includes tests for the proposed change of behavior.
test_add_c3 and c4 pass, because mandatory attributes can still be
set, and in the old behavior SD permissions were irrelevant
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14810
Pair-Programmed-With: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Nadezhda Ivanova <nivanova@symas.com>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This helps reduce the profusion of magic constant values in Python
tests.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14810
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We want to be able to use these values in Python tests.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14810
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
These are the newly-added AttributeAuthorizationOnLDAPAdd and
BlockOwnerImplicitRights.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14810
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
The variable sub_sddl1 previously went unused, so this call to
modify_sd_on_dn() was presumably intended to go here.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14810
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
All of its callers, where necessary, take out a transaction covering the
entire password set or change operation, so a transaction is no longer
needed here.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Now the initial account search is performed under the transaction,
ensuring the overall password change is atomic. We set DSDB_SESSION_INFO
to drop our privileges to those of the user before we perform the actual
password change, and restore them afterwards if we need to update the
bad password count.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We don't (and shouldn't) need system prvileges to perform the password
change, so drop to the privileges of the user by setting
DSDB_SESSION_INFO. We need to reuse the same sam_ctx: creating a new one
with only user privileges would not work, because any database
modifications would be blocked by the transaction taken out on the
original context.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This helps the bad password and audit log handling code as it
allows assumptions to be made about the attributes found in
the variable "msg", such as that DSDB_SEARCH_SHOW_EXTENDED_DN
was used.
This ensures we can re-search on the DN via the embedded GUID,
which in in turn rename-proof.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This may return an error if we find the account is locked out.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
If the account has been locked out in the meantime (indicated by
NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT), we should return the appropriate error
code.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
If the account has been locked out in the meantime (indicated by
NT_STATUS_ACCOUNT_LOCKED_OUT), we should return the appropriate error
code.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
If we find that the user has been locked out sometime during the request
(due to a race), we will now return an error code.
Note that we cannot avoid the MIT KDC aspect of the issue by checking
the return status of mit_samba_zero_bad_password_count(), because
kdb_vftabl::audit_as_req() returning void means we cannot pass on the
result.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This simplifies the code for the following commit.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14611
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
