IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
We should use long options in tests to make clear what we are trying to
do.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
These reports (about recently deleted objects)
create concern about a perfectly normal part of DB operation.
We must not operate on objects that are expired or we might reanimate them,
but we must fix "Deleted Objects" if it is wrong (mostly it is set as being
deleted in 9999, but in alpha19 we got this wrong).
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14593
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Feb 3 05:29:11 UTC 2021 on sn-devel-184
This fixes running `make test` in a release tarball!
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14542
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Bokovoy <ab@samba.org>
These will be removed anyway and any change on them risks to
be an originating update that causes replication problems.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13816
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Mar 14 03:12:27 UTC 2019 on sn-devel-144
These tests operate on provision dumps created long ago, they still
want to run tests on deleted objects, when the next commits remove
processing expired tombstone objects in dbcheck.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13816
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
When a parent object is removed during the tombstone garbage collection
before a child object and samba-tool dbcheck runs at the same time, the
following can happen:
- If the object child had DISALLOW_MOVE_ON_DELETE in systemFlags,
samba-tool dbcheck moves the object under the LostAndFound[Config]
object (as an originating update!)
- The lastKnownParent attribute is removed (as an originating update!)
These originating updates cause the object to have an extended time
as tombstone. And these changes are replicated to other DCs,
which very likely already removed the object completely!
This means the destination DC of replication has no chance to handle
the object it gets from the source DC with just 2 attributes (name, lastKnownParent).
The destination logs something like:
No objectClass found in replPropertyMetaData
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13816
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This is what we work with every day...
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13816
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
dbcheck would fail to fix up attributes where the extended DN's GUID is
correct, but the DN itself is incorrect. The code failed attempting to
remove the old/incorrect DN, e.g.
NOTE: old (due to rename or delete) DN string component for
objectCategory in object CN=alice,CN=Users,DC=samba,DC=example,DC=com -
<GUID=7bfdf9d8-62f9-420c-8a71-e3d3e931c91e>;
CN=Person,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=samba,DC=bad,DC=com
Change DN to <GUID=7bfdf9d8-62f9-420c-8a71-e3d3e931c91e>;
CN=Person,CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=samba,DC=example,DC=com?
[y/N/all/none] y
Failed to fix old DN string on attribute objectCategory : (16,
"attribute 'objectCategory': no matching attribute value while deleting
attribute on 'CN=alice,CN=Users,DC=samba,DC=example,DC=com'")
The problem was the LDB message specified the value to delete with its
full DN, including the GUID. The LDB code then helpfully corrected this
value on the way through, so that the DN got updated to reflect the
correct DN (i.e. 'DC=example,DC=com') of the object matching that GUID,
rather than the incorrect DN (i.e. 'DC=bad,DC=com') that we were trying
to remove. Because the requested value and the existing DB value didn't
match, the operation failed.
We can avoid this problem by passing down just the DN (not the extended
DN) of the value we want to delete. Without the GUID portion of the DN,
the LDB code will no longer try to correct it on the way through, and
the dbcheck operation will succeed.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13495
Signed-off-by: Tim Beale <timbeale@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Pair-programmed-with: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
These tests now confirm we can handle these issues at runtime
as well as at dbcheck
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13095
Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This will allow us to test other run-time behaviour with broken
databases.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This validates some more combinations and ensures that the changes
in 962a1b3220 are tested.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
The GUID index code will change the returned results order
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
We cannot add missing backlinks because of the duplicate checking. There
seems to be no trivial way to add the bypass.
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Handling backlinks appears to be rather non-deterministic, so the
forward link hangs off of the RODC replication group (which has no other
valid forward links). In other situations, it either won't delete the
memberOf, or the expected output order will vary.
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12600
Adds dbcheck 4.5.0pre1 to the knownfail, to be removed later.
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12600
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12577
Pair-programmed-with: Bob Campbell <bobcampbell@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Feb 13 07:33:08 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
The other dbcheck tests were getting over-complex, so we start a new test
here based on tombestone-expunge.sh, as we are looking at very similar
problems
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12297
