IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
It's also in the share_entry, but that is redundant and will go
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Feb 8 14:50:49 CET 2018 on sn-devel-144
Set SOCKET_CLOEXEC on the sockets returned by accept. This ensures that
the socket is unavailable to any child process created by system().
Making it harder for malicious code to set up a command channel,
as seen in the exploit for CVE-2015-0240
Signed-off-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Traversing a clustered tdb is a pretty expensive operation. If someone
really needs this command-line interface, we can re-add it for the local
node using messaging_dgm_forall. If someone needs that globally, there's
the "onnode all" script that could be used. Alternatively, we could
implement an enhanced ping broadcast message also returning a processes
unique id.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This used to be a hygiene command for clustered node startup. In
clustered mode, CLEAR_IF_FIRST does not work, records can stay alive
by means of recovery. serverid.tdb will soon die, so remove this
command.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
The only user of this is an informative message in smbcontrol. I don't think
that's worth the effort.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
namemap_cache.c saves these as strv lists: An array of 0-terminated strings.
"net cache list" only printfs the values, so they would be cut off.
We might want to do this with other gencache values too in the future.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Currently for sessions where authentication is still in progress we
print uid and gid as -1.
With this change we nicely list them like this:
PID Username Group Machine Protocol Version ....
6604 (auth in progress) 127.0.0.1 (ipv4:127.0.0.1:47930) SMB3_11 ....
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reading the SD may be denied but changing ownership could be allowed. As
we don't really need the server SD for the change ownership request,
don't fetch it.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Oct 7 00:04:54 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
This uses the NT4 replication commands. Samba does not have a server
for this, no tests, and whoever needs to migrate a native domain can
use an old Samba version
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
If a local user wants to change his password using smbpasswd and the
machine is a domain member, we need to make sure we authenticate against
our SAM and not ask winbind.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12975
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlet <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12629
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Aug 23 03:23:55 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12974
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Aug 18 14:01:27 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
GCC 7.1 produces an error:
‘snprintf’ output between 47 and 66 bytes into a destination of size 40
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12930
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Aug 9 13:37:47 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
uint16_t get_fileinfo(...) returns file attributes, this function
called
cli_qfileinfo_basic(cli, fnum, &mode, NULL, NULL, NULL,
NULL, NULL, NULL);
which was failing with NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED errors when fnum above
was obtained via (when using protocol > SMB). Note: This only seems to be
an issue when run against a windows server, with smbd SMB1 & SMB2 work fine.
status = cli_ntcreate(cli, filename, 0, CREATE_ACCESS_READ,
0, FILE_SHARE_READ|FILE_SHARE_WRITE,
FILE_OPEN, 0x0, 0x0, &fnum, NULL);
The failing cli_qfileinfo_basic call above is unnecessary as we can already
obtain the required information from the cli_ntcreate call
Signed-off-by: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Don't print the table header for every entry.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12875
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Jul 4 00:12:46 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
secrets_delete_entry() fails if the key doesn't exist.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12782
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
4d404f2 added user-data for a g_lock. Print it in net g_lock dump.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
To be honest, it did not really make sense to just pass in
lock holders individually. You could argue that it made sense
with in reality only G_LOCK_WRITE around, but soon we will have
G_LOCK_READ and thus multiple lock holders on a single lock.
Now that we also have userdata, change the g_lock_dump API
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
