IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
At more than one large site I've seen significant problems due to
gencache_stabilize. gencache_stabilize was mainly introduced to
survive machine crashes with the cache still being in place. Given
that most installations crash rarely and this is still a cache, this
safety is overkill and causes real problems.
With the recent changes to tdb, we should be safe enough to run on
completely corrupted databases and properly detect errors. A further
commit will introduce code that wipes the gencache.tdb if such a
corruption is detected.
There is one kind of corruption that we don't properly handle:
Orphaned space in the database. I don't have a good idea yet how to
handle this in a graceful and efficient way during normal operations,
but maybe this idea pops up at some point.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
It's a pain to recompile the world if gencache.h changes
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Oct 19 18:52:50 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
This reflects that the messaging context is also used outside of the
server processes.
The command used for the rename:
find . -name '*.[hc]' -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i 's/server_messaging_context/global_messaging_context/'
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <cs@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
This reflects that the event context is also used outside of the server
processes.
The command used for the rename:
find . -name '*.[hc]' -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i 's/server_event_context/global_event_context/'
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <cs@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Fix a confusing API: Many places TALLOC_FREE the path where it's not
clear you have to do it.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Having a central tevent_req per winbind child request is prerequisite
for request profiling
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Jun 19 11:43:16 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
This has an async code path hidden inside. Expose that properly.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This is meant to replace the synchronous "dispatch_table".
The current dispatch_table assumes that every synchronous function does
the request_ok or request_error itself. This mixes two concerns: Doing
the work and shipping the reply to the winbind client. This new dispatch
table will make it possible to centralize shipping the reply to the
client. At a later stage this will enable easier statistics on how long
request processing took precisely.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This was (possibly) used as an example in the early days of the async winbind
code we have today. It's not necessary to send this through a full tevent_req
round.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Apr 24 17:18:23 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
This is required because we need a new pointer for LDB after the fork,
and with LMDB we can not longer rely on tdb_reopen_all() to do that
for us.
This can not be done in reinit_after_fork() due to the dependency loop
this would create.
Signed-off-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We have a stackframe we can use for the lifetime of the session.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Feb 21 02:46:40 CET 2018 on sn-devel-144
We have a static list of trust based on our configuration.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Set SOCKET_CLOEXEC on the sockets returned by accept. This ensures that
the socket is unavailable to any child process created by system().
Making it harder for malicious code to set up a command channel,
as seen in the exploit for CVE-2015-0240
Signed-off-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Dec 5 04:58:26 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13150
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Nov 18 04:07:24 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
Don't use winbind_messaging_context anymore.
This fixes a bug analysed by Peter Somogyi <PSOMOGYI@hu.ibm.com>: If a
parent winbind forks, it only called reinit_after_fork on
winbind_messaging_context. On the other hand, deep in dbwrap_open we use
server_messaging_context(). This is not reinitialized by
winbind_reinit_after fork, so the parent and child share a ctdb
connection. This is invalid, because replies from ctdb end up in the
wrong process.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13150
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
There's no point in having two global event contexts
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13150
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
With modern messaging this doesn't do anything (it's an
empty destructor). Clean up so we can add a proper destructor
in future.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Feb 22 23:39:13 CET 2016 on sn-devel-144
