1
0
mirror of https://github.com/samba-team/samba.git synced 2025-11-18 00:23:50 +03:00
Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Andrew Tridgell
144cc3da5e r10493: we need sys/select.h to enable select() in the solaris workaround 2007-10-10 13:38:55 -05:00
Andrew Tridgell
980dd17f7d r10492: work around a bug in solaris which cases lock upgrades to fail with
EDEADLK even when progress can be made. This is not a good solution,
but I can't find anything better.
2007-10-10 13:38:55 -05:00
Andrew Tridgell
196995ea38 r10484: try to fix the pread/pwrite declaration problems 2007-10-10 13:38:53 -05:00
Andrew Tridgell
ab953c8c72 r10471: stratos doesn't have getpagesize(), so guess 8k on systems that don't
have it. Overestimating is harmless.
2007-10-10 13:38:51 -05:00
Andrew Tridgell
e615f36733 r10466: work around missing pread/pwrite declaration on openbsd 2007-10-10 13:38:49 -05:00
Andrew Tridgell
294ccfd46a r10465: separate out a read_only db from a read-only traversal to ensure we
don't end up doing a mmap read only
2007-10-10 13:38:49 -05:00
Andrew Tridgell
03942dd54b r10459: fixed some portability problems 2007-10-10 13:38:48 -05:00
Andrew Tridgell
7dd31288a7 r10421: following on discussions with simo, I have worked out a way of
allowing searches to proceed while another process is in a
transaction, then only upgrading the transaction lock to a write lock
on commit.

The solution is:

 - split tdb_traverse() into two calls, called tdb_traverse() and
   tdb_traverse_read(). The _read() version only gets read locks, and
   will fail any write operations made in the callback from the
   traverse.

 - the normal tdb_traverse() call allows for read or write operations
   in the callback, but gets the transaction lock, preventing
   transastions from starting inside the traverse

In addition we enforce the following rule that you may not start a
transaction within a traverse callback, although you can start a
traverse within a transaction

With these rules in place I believe all the deadlock possibilities are
removed, and we can now allow for searches to happen in parallel with
transactions
2007-10-10 13:38:44 -05:00
Andrew Tridgell
06bd8abba9 r10405: added transactions into tdb, and hook them into ldb. See my
samba-technical posting for more details on the transactions design.

This also adds a number of command line arguments to tdbtorture,
making it more flexible, and fixes some lock deadlock conditions in
the tdbtorture code.
2007-10-10 13:38:41 -05:00
Andrew Tridgell
4673cdd0d2 r10253: a fairly large tdb cleanup and re-organise. Nearly all of this change
just involves splitting up the core tdb.c code into separate files on
logical boundaries, but there are some minor functional changes as well:

 - move the 'struct tdb_context' into tdb_private.h, hiding it from
   users. This was done to allow the structure to change without
   breaking code that uses tdb.

 - added accessor functions tdb_fd(), tdb_name(), and tdb_log_fn() to
   access the elements of struct tdb_context that were used by
   external code but are no longer visible

 - simplied tdb_append() to use tdb_fetch()/tdb_store(), which is just
   as good due to the way tdb locks work

 - changed some of the types (such as tdb_off to tdb_off_t) to make
   syntax highlighting work better

 - removed the old optional spinlock code. It was a bad idea.

 - fixed a bug in tdb_reopen_all() that caused tdbtorture to sometimes
   fail or report nasty looking errors. This is the only real bug
   fixed in this commit. Jeremy/Jerry, you might like to pickup this
   change for Samba3, as that could definately affect smbd in
   Samba3.

The aim of all of these changes is to make the tdb
transactions/journaling code I am working on easier to write. I
started to write it on top of the existing tdb.c code and it got very
messy. Splitting up the code makes it much easier to follow.

There are more cleanups we could do in tdb, such as using uint32_t
instead of u32 (suggested by metze). I'll leave those for another day.
2007-10-10 13:38:12 -05:00