IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Jun 18 07:03:18 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
We need to migrate all pathname based VFS calls to use a struct
to finish modernising the VFS with extra timestamp and flags parameters.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
This is not a full fix yet as we don't allow compound requests
after going async.
With SMB 3.11 requiring signed TreeConnect requests it's pointless
to try to compound requests after a SessionSetup.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12845
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Jun 17 10:55:25 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
Treat them identically. Create them on demand after for a tcon call,
and delete them on a tdis call.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12831
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
Save and restore tcon pointers in smb1 or smb2 structs.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12831
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@gmail.com>
This makes the behaviour much more robust, particularly with forest child
domains over one-way forest trusts.
Sadly we don't support this kind of setup with our current ADDC, so
there's no way to have automated tests for this behaviour, but
at least we know it doesn't break any existing tests.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8630
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This implements the same behavior as Windows,
we should pass the domain and account names given
by the client directly to the auth backends,
they can decide if they are able to process the
authentication pass it to the next backend.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8630
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We should avoid contacting winbind if we already know the domain is our
local sam or our primary domain.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8630
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
xattr_tdb needs g_lock in a clustered environment. Nobody else
uses LOCK_ORDER_3 at this moment, so this looks safe.
The last one to use this was dbwrap_watch.tdb, and that's gone. The only
other one was notify_index.tdb, and that's gone too.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Protect smbd against version incompatibilities in a cluster.
At first startup smbd locks "samba_version_string" and writes its version
string. It then downgrades the lock to a read lock. Subsequent smbds check
against the version string and also keep the read lock around. If the version
does not match, we try to write our own version. But as there's a read lock,
the lock upgrade to write lock will fail due the read lock being around. So as
long as there's one smbd with this read lock, no other version of smbd will be
able to start.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
To be honest, it did not really make sense to just pass in
lock holders individually. You could argue that it made sense
with in reality only G_LOCK_WRITE around, but soon we will have
G_LOCK_READ and thus multiple lock holders on a single lock.
Now that we also have userdata, change the g_lock_dump API
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Sequel to the previous commit changing the get/put routines for
the on-disk format
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
The next patches will make g_locks carry data. This
prepares the on-disk format.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
No code change, just shuffling around:
Before this patchset, g_lock_parse was somewhere in the middle. This carries no
real logic, put it on top.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
clang had complained with
../source3/lib/ctdbd_conn.c:1784:34: warning: variable 'send_state' used in loop condition
not modified in loop body [-Wfor-loop-analysis]
for (send_state = c->send_list; send_state != NULL;) {
^~~~~~~~~~
../source3/lib/ctdbd_conn.c:1791:34: warning: variable 'recv_state' used in loop condition
not modified in loop body [-Wfor-loop-analysis]
for (recv_state = c->recv_list; recv_state != NULL;) {
^~~~~~~~~~
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Jun 10 03:33:13 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
These extra flags are an [in,out] argument, so we have to initialize
them to 0. If we pass NETLOGON_SAMLOGON_FLAG_PASS_TO_FOREST_ROOT
or NETLOGON_SAMLOGON_FLAG_PASS_CROSS_FOREST_HOP, a Windows Server
will just return NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER with authoritative=1
(at least if it is itself a DC of the forest root and the requested
domain is the local domain of the DC).
Pair-Programmed-With: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
This function updates cli->server_{os,type,domain} to valid values
after a session setup.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12779
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
messaging_init_internal() blanket returned NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR
instead of correctly changing the return code to an NTSTATUS code. Also
return more appropriate mem error.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12828
Signed-off-by: David Mulder <dmulder@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Jun 8 08:04:05 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
This fixes a regression and prints the session setup on connect again:
Domain=[SAMBA-TEST] OS=[Windows 6.1] Server=[Samba 4.7.0pre1-DEVELOPERBUILD]
smb: \>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12824
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
