IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This is the same pointer and we don't have a lot of callers,
so we can just use one pointer.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
That makes it clearer that no tevent_context wrapper is used here
and the related code should really run without any (active) impersonation
as before.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
These are the two opcodes with DO_CHDIR, we don't want the
set_current_case_sensitive() logic for them,
so we don't need the full set_current_service() anymore.
The AS_USER case is already handled before, set_current_case_sensitive()
is called directly before change_to_user(), which already
calls chdir_current_service().
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
change_to_user() will soon call chdir_current_service() and we should
make sure conn->case_sensitive is prepared before calling vfs_ChDir().
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
This is just an optimization and it makes it clearer
that calling change_to_root_user() just before change_to_guest()
is useless and confusing.
We call change_to_guest() before set_current_service() now,
but that has no impact as we pass 'do_chdir=false'
as AS_GUEST is never mixed with AS_USER or DO_CHDIR.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Jun 14 23:38:55 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
We already call allow_access() when we accept the connection
in smbd_add_connection().
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
result_independent_of_operands: "(outsize - 4 & 0xffffff) >> 16 >> 8" is
0 regardless of the values of its operands. This occurs as the bitwise
first operand of "&".
So we should just pass a variable to silence the warning. However for
this, we should calculate it correctly and use size_t for it.
Found by Coverity.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
One dependency of includes.h less
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Apr 24 22:26:22 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
pthreadpool_tevent_init() doesn't start any thread yet, it only
allocates a bit of memory.
It's easier to start this in a central place, so that it's
available to all VFS modules.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
The loop is unnecessary, both susv4 as well as the Linux manpage
explicitly say:
> These functions shall not return an error code of [EINTR].
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This is required because we need a new pointer for LDB after the fork,
and with LMDB we can not longer rely on tdb_reopen_all() to do that
for us.
This can not be done in reinit_after_fork() due to the dependency loop
this would create.
Signed-off-by: Gary Lockyer <gary@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Dec 5 04:58:26 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
When setting up the chain, always use 'next->' variables
not the 'req->' one.
Bug discovered by 连一汉 <lianyihan@360.cn>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13041
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
We always return in the if-branch before. The else is redundant
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This prepares the same logic we've implemented in messages_dgm for clustering
that is used in 6d3c064f1a5: We need to reply for messages from ctdb in nested
event contexts properly.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reported to the Samba Team by Yihan Lian <lianyihan@360.cn>, a security
researcher of Qihoo 360 GearTeam. Thanks a lot!
smb1_parse_chain() incorrectly used talloc_tos() for the memory
context of the chained smb1 requests. This gets freed between
requests so if a chained request goes async, the saved request
array also is freed, which causes a crash on resume.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12836
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Torture test to follow.
Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Bokovoy <ab@samba.org>
rpmlint has a check for this and prefers to call chdir() before
chroot(). If not it will complain with
missing-call-to-chdir-with-chroot. The old code equivalent secure. See
http://unixwiz.net/techtips/chroot-practices.html
This removes several unneeded talloc_tos() calls.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Feb 13 03:50:54 CET 2016 on sn-devel-144
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Jan 22 11:06:05 CET 2016 on sn-devel-144
This is in preperation of connection passing where we have to set
seq_low to the mid from the negprot we've handed over.
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Oct 7 00:54:34 CEST 2015 on sn-devel-104
Add an option to wait_for_read_send(), so that the request, upon
calling back, report whether the socket actually contains data
or is in EOF/error state. EOF is signalled via the EPIPE error.
This is useful for clients which do not expect data to arrive but
wait for readability to detect a closed socket (i.e. they do not
intend to actually read the socket when it's readable). Actual data
arrival would indicate a bug in this case, so the check can
be used to print an error message.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11397
Signed-off-by: Uri Simchoni <urisimchoni@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11373
Guenther
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Pair-Programmed-With: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Mainly to have the new macros actually used in the code.
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <cs@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Jun 11 04:34:50 CEST 2015 on sn-devel-104
What?
This patch gets rid of the central shared memory segment referenced by
"profile_p". Instead, every smbd gets a static profile_area where it collects
profiling data. Once a second, every smbd writes this profiling data into a
record of its own in a "smbprofile.tdb". smbstatus -P does a tdb_traverse on this
database and sums up what it finds.
Why?
At least in my perception sysv IPC has not the best reputation on earth. The
code before this patch uses shmat(). Samba ages ago has developed a good
abstraction of shared memory: It's called tdb.
The main reason why I started this is that I have a request to become
more flexible with profiling data. Samba should be able to collect data
per share or per user, something which is almost impossible to do with
a fixed structure. My idea is to for example install a profile area per
share and every second marshall this into one tdb record indexed by share
name. smbstatus -P would then also collect the data and either aggregate
them or put them into individual per-share statistics. This flexibility
in the data model is not really possible with one fixed structure.
But isn't it slow?
Well, I don't think so. I can't really prove it, but I do believe that on large
boxes atomically incrementing a shared memory value for every SMB does show up
due to NUMA effects. With this patch the hot code path is completely
process-local. Once a second every smbd writes into a central tdb, this of
course does atomic operations. But it's once a second, not on every SMB2 read.
There's two places where I would like to improve things: With the current code
all smbds wake up once a second. With 10,000 potentially idle smbds this will
become noticable. That's why the current only starts the timer when something has
changed.
The second place is the tdb traverse: Right now traverse is blocking in the
sense that when it has to switch hash chains it will block. With mutexes, this
means a syscall. I have a traverse light in mind that works as follows: It
assumes a locked hash chain and then walks the complete chain in one run
without unlocking in between. This way the caller can do nonblocking locks in
the first round and only do blocking locks in a second round. Also, a lot of
syscall overhead will vanish. This way smbstatus -P will have almost zero
impact on normal operations.
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
This attaches a smbXsrv_connection to a smbXsrv_client structure.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
