IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This only makes sure the code compiles again. I'm not able to test this
yet.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
dbcheck of the rid pool (CN=RID Set) for another server will otherwise fail because
rIDNextRid is not replicated, and so it not present
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12178
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10882
Autobuild-User(master): Garming Sam <garming@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Aug 29 08:53:14 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
With a binary search, this can only be tested on 3+ elements.
Pair-programmed-with: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Bob Campbell <bobcampbell@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Garming Sam <garming@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Aug 25 14:22:25 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
This doesn't fix the partialAttrSetEx case, so the test is left in the
knownfail file.
Signed-off-by: Bob Campbell <bobcampbell@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This has an odd behaviour where PartialAttrSetEx does not respect the
incoming mapping. PartialAttrSetEx is not respected in Samba at all.
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
On Windows this does not seem to fail, but causes silent errors.
Pair-programmed-with: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Bob Campbell <bobcampbell@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This will cause silent errors in the translation, but as far as we know,
Windows will accept it just fine.
Pair-programmed-with: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Bob Campbell <bobcampbell@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Pair-programmed-with: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Bob Campbell <bobcampbell@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Pair-Programmed-With: Guenther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Guenther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Aug 23 05:00:13 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
Signed-off-by: kkhaike <kkhaike@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Uri Simchoni <uri@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Uri Simchoni <uri@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Aug 19 09:35:15 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
Add tests that show copychunk behavior when the
source and dest handles have execute right instead
of read-data right.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12149
Signed-off-by: Uri Simchoni <uri@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Separate file creation (which requires write access) from the
opening of the file for the test (which might be without write
access).
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12149
Signed-off-by: Uri Simchoni <uri@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
This test (passes against Windows Server 2012R2) shows
that the implicit FILE_READ_DATA that is added whenever
FILE_EXECUTE is granted, is not reported back when querying
the handle.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12149
Signed-off-by: Uri Simchoni <uri@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Add functions which create a file or a directory with
specific desired access.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12149
Signed-off-by: Uri Simchoni <uri@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
We also take the chance to make it clearer that the number
being passed in should be unique.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12128
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
We already do that for objects in dsdb_convert_object_ex().
We need to be consistent and do the same for linked attributes.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12128
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
dsdb_create_prefix_mapping() should be the only place that calls
dsdb_schema_pfm_make_attid().
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12128
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
We may not have a prefix mapping for the new attribute definition,
it will be added later.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12128
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
We should create the working_schema prefix map before we try to
resolve the schema. This allows getting the same mapping (if there's not already
a conflict) and allows us to remove the implicit prefix mapping creation
in the prefix mapping lookup functions.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12128
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
We allow a hint for the id from the remote prefix map.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12128
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This avoids confusion when reading the talloc dump from a ldb context that has
been the target of replication, as the dsdb_schema_copy_shallow() memory was
still around, if unused.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12115
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This attempts to make it clear what memory is short term and what memory is long term
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12115
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
It's perfectly valid to replicate from a partner with an older schema
version, otherwise schema changes would block any other replication
until every dc in the forest has the schema changes.
The avoids an endless loop trying to get schema in sync with the partner.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12115
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This will simplify the schema checking in future.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12115
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This test uses tshark and cwrap's packet capturing capability
to observe the Kerberos handshakes and ensure the correct
encryption types are being used.
Signed-off-by: Uri Simchoni <uri@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Aug 9 07:43:52 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
This patch removes part of what's categorized in the code as
"hideous glue", which causes Heimdal to ignore krb5.conf
encryption types, and instead use either the application-
supplied values or the default compile-time values.
Signed-off-by: Uri Simchoni <uri@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
