1
0
mirror of https://github.com/samba-team/samba.git synced 2025-06-18 19:17:08 +03:00

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Volker Lendecke
3b4a402bc5 Fix the build of db_open_trans with CLUSTER_SUPPORT enabled
Metze, you might want to check this.
2008-04-14 13:13:46 +02:00
Stefan Metzmacher
5cea2bf367 dbwrap: use db_open_tdb2() in for db_open_trans() if "dbwrap:use_tdb2=yes"
For clustered setups you need to disable the ctdb backend for each
tdb which should use the tdb2 backend (e.g. ctdb:registry.tdb=no).

To disable tdb2 per tdb use something like "tdb2:passdb.tdb=no"

metze
2008-04-12 09:14:09 +02:00
Stefan Metzmacher
74a070b8a2 dbwrap: add db_open_trans()
This should be used when transactions are wanted.
For now it's just a wrapper of db_open(), but this
will change.

metze

Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
2008-03-27 18:14:56 +01:00
Alexander Bokovoy
0c8e23afbb Merge CTDB-related fixes from samba-ctdb 3.0 branch (http://samba.org/~tridge/3_0-ctdb)
Signed-off-by: Alexander Bokovoy <ab@samba.org>
2008-01-16 12:09:48 +03:00
Volker Lendecke
1e214b536b Add dbwrap bystring service routines 2007-12-10 16:06:32 +01:00
Andrew Tridgell
b0132e94fc r23784: use the GPLv3 boilerplate as recommended by the FSF and the license text 2007-10-10 12:28:22 -05:00
Jeremy Allison
407e6e695b r23779: Change from v2 or later to v3 or later.
Jeremy.
2007-10-10 12:28:20 -05:00
Volker Lendecke
15553d6327 r23410: Merge the core of the cluster code.
I'm 100% certain I've forgotten to merge something, but the main code
should be in. It's mainly in dbwrap_ctdb.c, ctdbd_conn.c and
messages_ctdbd.c.

There should be no changes to the non-cluster case, it does survive make
test on my laptop.

It survives some very basic tests with ctdbd enables, I did not do the
full test suite for clusters yet.

Phew...

Volker
2007-10-10 12:23:14 -05:00
Volker Lendecke
e9d7484ca2 r22775: For the cluster code I've developed a wrapper around tdb to put different
database backends in place dynamically.

The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h.  You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().

I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)

This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.

If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.

Volker
2007-10-10 12:21:56 -05:00