IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
With Windows, when aging is off, the record timestamps are updated
anyway, but the timestamp change is not replicated.
We are not going to do it like that. With aging off, our records will
keep their first timestamp.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We want to sometimes be able to say "we know Windows fails, it fails
like this, it is OK", so that when we run the tests on Windows we know
the failures are not unexpected.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
When records are added and deleted and added again, Windows gets all
kinds of ideas about what should happen, and many of our tests explore
that. Here we focus the simplest case with a variety of timestamp
combinations.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Using dns.DNS_QCLASS_ANY we can delete all the records of a certain
type. What happens to other timestamps? The answer should be nothing.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Can a TXT record be replaced by an A record in an RPC update?
According to Windows, yes.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We have always used hours where we are meant to use NTTIME. Let's make
sure we don't break old tombstones.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This fails on Windows due to apparent races between the RPC, DNS, and
LDAP servers. There is no point having it sit there doing nothing.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We can't make scavenging happen on demand on Windows, so we just
concentrate on Samba here.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
By "developers", I of course mean "me".
Other environments insist on secure updates, which these tests don't
do.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
When trying to understand the results of these tests, it is not very
helpful to have messages like:
AssertionError: 3685511 != 3685343
when the only thing you want to know is the difference between these two
numbers. So here we make timestamp specific assertions.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This incorporates tests from various dns*.py files, but makes them
correct.
All but one of these tests pass against Windows 2012r2.
Further patches will remove the broken tests in other files, and fix
Samba so it passes these.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Jun 11 09:29:23 UTC 2021 on sn-devel-184
