IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
I'm 100% certain I've forgotten to merge something, but the main code
should be in. It's mainly in dbwrap_ctdb.c, ctdbd_conn.c and
messages_ctdbd.c.
There should be no changes to the non-cluster case, it does survive make
test on my laptop.
It survives some very basic tests with ctdbd enables, I did not do the
full test suite for clusters yet.
Phew...
Volker
(This used to be commit 15553d6327a3aecdd2b0b94a3656d04bf4106323)
database backends in place dynamically.
The main abstractions are db_context and db_record, it should be mainly
self-describing, see include/dbwrap.h. You open the db just as you would open
a tdb, this time with db_open(). If you want to fetch a record, just do the
db->fetch() call, if you want to do operations on it, you need to get it with
fetch_locked().
I added dbwrap_file.c (not heavily tested lately) as an example for what can
be done with that abstraction, uses a file per key. So if anybody is willing
to shape that up, we might have a chance on reiserfs again.... :-)
This abstraction works fine for brlock.tdb, locking.tdb, connections.tdb and
sessionid.tdb. It should work fine for the others as well, I just did not yet
get around to convert them.
If nobody loudly screams NO, then I will import the code that uses this soon.
Volker
(This used to be commit e9d7484ca246cfca4a1fd23be35edc2783136ebe)
