IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
We now allow this to be via the ENCTYPE_AES256_CTS_HMAC_SHA1_96 hash instead
which allows us to decouple Samba from the unsalted NT hash for
organisations that are willing to take this step (for user accounts).
(History checking is limited to the last three passwords only, as
ntPwdHistory is limited to NT hash values, and the PrimaryKerberosCtr4
package only stores three sets of keys.)
Since we don't store a salt per-key, but only a single salt, the check
will fail for a previous password if the account was renamed prior to a
newer password being set.
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Certain escape sequences are not valid in Python string literals, and
will eventually result in a SyntaxError.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
This test often fails because the server takes too long to time out.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We need to ensure that even if NTLM is disabled, that the test
can still bootstrap and fail normally.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
We should make sure that we use NTLMSSP or Kerberos consistently
for the tests and don't mix them.
We're also much stricter and symmetric_difference() to
check if the sets are actually the same.
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
We want to disable SAMR password changes for Protected Users, but need
to ensure that other methods of changing the password still work.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Test that NTLM and SAMR password changes cannot be used for Protected
Users, and that lockouts are not triggered for attempting to use them.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
The removal of LM hash storage changes the expected metadata.
We do not need to track these values exactly to prove the
behaviour here.
This is not due to the changes in password_hash directly, which in
update_final_msg() sets DSDB_FLAG_INTERNAL_FORCE_META_DATA to force
a push out of the removed attribute to the replication state.
However at the stage of a subsequent LDAP Delete there is no longer
a lmPwdHistory nor dBCSPwd attribute, in the directory, so there is
no subsequent version bump to remove them when building a tombstone.
Samba's behaviour is different to that seen by Metze on windows 2022,
where he sees dBCSPwd removed (for the no LM store case) but
lmPwdHistory kept. We in Samba choose to differ, not storing an
ambiguous LM hsitory (of "" values likely), so allowing any version
for these two attributes is the sensible choice.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13879
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This makes it possible to catch failures with knownfail entries.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13879
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This will make further changes easier.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13879
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
The most important case is that we still have a previous
password cached at the RODC and the inbound replication
hasn't wiped the cache yet and we also haven't triggered
a new replication yet.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14865
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We were instead only checking the expected error.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We allow a timeout of 2x over to avoid this being a flapping test.
Samba is not very accurate on the timeout, which is not otherwise an
issue but makes this test fail sometimes.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14694
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Validate Writes and Control Access Rights should only grant access if the
object is of the type listed in the Right's appliesTo attribute.
Tests to verify this behavior
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14832
Signed-off-by: Nadezhda Ivanova <nivanova@symas.com>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Without these calls the tests could pass if an expected error did not
occur.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14832
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
[abartlet@samba.org Included in backport as changing ACLs while
ACL tests are not checking for unexpected success would be bad]
This new restriction breaks a large number of assumptions in the tests, like
that you can remove some UF_ flags, because it turns out doing so will
make the 'computer' a 'user' again, and this will fail.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14753
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
This favors a test that confirms we got an error over getting exactly
the right error, at least for now.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14753
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Objects of objectclass computer are computers by default now and this changes
the sAMAccountType and primaryGroupID as well as userAccountControl
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14753
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
We now enforce that a trust account must be a user.
These can not be added over LDAP anyway, and our C
code in the RPC server gets this right in any case.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14753
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
The parts that create and delete a single object can be
safely split out into an individual test.
At this point the parts that fail against Windows 2019 are:
error: __main__.SamTests.test_userAccountControl_computer_add_normal [
_ldb.LdbError: (53, 'LDAP error 53 LDAP_UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM - <0000052D: SvcErr: DSID-031A1236, problem 5003 (WILL_NOT_PERFORM), data 0\n> <>')
error: __main__.SamTests.test_userAccountControl_computer_modify [
_ldb.LdbError: (53, 'LDAP error 53 LDAP_UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM - <0000052D: SvcErr: DSID-031A1236, problem 5003 (WILL_NOT_PERFORM), data 0\n> <>')
error: __main__.SamTests.test_userAccountControl_user_add_0_uac [
_ldb.LdbError: (53, 'LDAP error 53 LDAP_UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM - <0000052D: SvcErr: DSID-031A1236, problem 5003 (WILL_NOT_PERFORM), data 0\n> <>')
error: __main__.SamTests.test_userAccountControl_user_add_normal [
_ldb.LdbError: (53, 'LDAP error 53 LDAP_UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM - <0000052D: SvcErr: DSID-031A1236, problem 5003 (WILL_NOT_PERFORM), data 0\n> <>')
error: __main__.SamTests.test_userAccountControl_user_modify [
_ldb.LdbError: (53, 'LDAP error 53 LDAP_UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM - <0000052D: SvcErr: DSID-031A1236, problem 5003 (WILL_NOT_PERFORM), data 0\n> <>')
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14753
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Objects with objectclass computer now have UF_WORKSTATION_TRUST_ACCOUNT
by default and so this test must adapt.
The changes to this test passes against Windows 2019 except for
the new behaviour around the UF_WORKSTATION_TRUST_ACCOUNT default.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14753
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
This makes many of our tests pass again. We do not pass against Windows 2019 on all
as this does not have this restriction at this time.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14753
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
This helps ensure we cover off all the cases that matter
for objectclass/trailing-doller/userAccountControl
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14753
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
This will allow these to be listed in a knownfail shortly.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14753
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
This allows future patches to restrict changing the account type
without triggering an error.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14753
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
The idea here is to split out the restrictions seen on Windows 2019
at the schema level, as seen when acting as an administrator.
These pass against Windows 2019 except for the account type swapping
which is not wanted.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14753
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
This changes most of the simple pattern with self.samdb.modify()
to use the wrapper. Some other calls still need to be converted, while
the complex decision tree tests should remain as-is for now.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Oct 4 21:55:43 UTC 2021 on sn-devel-184
This is easier to reason with regarding which cases should work
and which cases should fail, avoiding issues where more success
than expected would be OK because a self.fail() was missed in a
try: block.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This gets us closer to passing against Windows 2019, without
making major changes to what was tested. More tests are needed,
but it is important to get what was being tested tested again.
Account types (eg UF_NORMAL_ACCOUNT, UF_WORKSTATION_TRUST_ACCOUNT)
are now required on all objects, this can't be omitted any more.
Also for UF_NORMAL_ACCOUNT for these accounts without a password
set |UF_PASSWD_NOTREQD must be included.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Bokovoy <ab@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Sep 15 08:49:11 UTC 2021 on sn-devel-184
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This generates a single test per bit which is easier to
debug. Elsewhere we use this pattern where we want to
be able to put some cases in a knownfail, which is otherwise
not possible.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
