IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
locking.c:open_read_only was unused
don't export the silly boolean flag locking_init(bool read_only)
(This used to be commit 2f3c865707010bc7c463a02782dbee3dc2479da1)
bugs in various places whilst doing this (places that assumed
BOOL == int). I also need to fix the Samba4 pidl generation
(next checkin).
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit f35a266b3cbb3e5fa6a86be60f34fe340a3ca71f)
fixed a bug with dead share mode entries
jra: please tell me if it's ok to merge this to 3_2_0.
metze
(This used to be commit 044ac6afa7a36b352f4cb203879af082d4726417)
POSIX locking. We can't do lock counts with POSIX,
so stop counting if we get a POSIX lock request.
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit a48e4a29e6774e5e72b9b361a17207b053474521)
This replaces the internal explicit dev/ino file id representation by a
"struct file_id". This is necessary as cluster file systems and NFS
don't necessarily assign the same device number to the shared file
system. With this structure in place we can now easily add different
schemes to map a file to a unique 64-bit device node.
Jeremy, you might note that I did not change the external interface of
smb_share_modes.c.
Volker
(This used to be commit 9b10dbbd5de8813fc15ebbb6be9b18010ffe8139)
lock we know nothing about that we retry the lock every
10 seconds instead of waiting for the standard select
timeout. This is how we used to (and are supposed to)
work.
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit fa18fc25a50cf13c687ae88e7e5e2dda1120e017)
locking/locking.c we have to send retry messages to timed lock holders.
The majority of this patch passes a "struct messaging_context" down
there. No functional change, survives make test.
(This used to be commit bbb508414683eeddd2ee0d2d36fe620118180bbb)
have any outstanding locks or blocking locks then
we don't need to read the lock db. on close.
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit 1b063496f93f78347a6e67549bde54c845499a7d)
Windows Vista RC1 and RC2 can't delete directory on Samba share
based on work by Joe Meadows <jmeadows@webopolis.com>.
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit 2dab8928769938ab79da7b7ce2d165fc388f9b00)
Move more error code returns to NTSTATUS.
Client test code to follow... See if this
passes the build-farm before I add it into
3.0.25.
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit 83dbbdff345fa9e427c9579183f4380004bf3dd7)
works - even with the strange "initial delete on close"
semantics. The "initial delete on close" flag isn't
committed to the share mode db until the handle is
closed, and is discarded if any real "delete on close"
was set. This allows me to remove the "initial_delete_on_close"
flag from the share db, and move it into a BOOL in files_struct.
Warning ! You must do a make clean after this. Cope with
the wrinkle in directory delete on close which is done
differently from files. We now pass all Samba4 smbtortute
BASE-DELETE tests except for the one checking that files
can't be created in a directory which has the delete on
close set (possibly expensive to fix).
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit f2df77a1497958c1ea791f1d2f4446b5fc3389b3)
Allow us to correctly refuse to set delete on close on a
non-empty directory. There are still some delete-on-close
wrinkles to be fixed, but I understand how to do that better
now. I'll fix this tomorrow.
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit 029635885825a5562e7974a6f5675cce3bf1b5dc)
we don't get the chainlock when getting the byte range
lock record read-only.
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit fcd798ca0c1b76adb2bcda4a99c40c7aacb0addb)
a POSIX lock (applying a read-lock) and we overlap
pending read locks then send them an unlock message,
we may have allowed them to proceed.
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit a7a0b6ba50f4cf7c5a0a29809fdff9e1266a29e7)
fix the messaging code to call the efficient calls :
save_re_uid()
set_effective_uid(0);
messaging_op
restore_re_uid();
instead of using heavyweight become_root()/unbecome_root()
pairs around all messaging code. Fixup the messaging
code to ensure sec_init() is called (only once) so that non-root
processes still work when sending messages.
This is a lighter weight solution to become_root()/unbecome_root()
(which swaps all the supplemental groups) and should be more
efficient. I will migrate all server code over to using this
(a similar technique should be used in the passdb backend
where needed).
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit 4ace291278d9a44f5c577bdd3b282c1231e543df)
region between detecting a pending lock was needed
and when we added the blocking lock record. Make
sure that we hold the lock over all this period.
Removed the old code for doing blocking locks on
SMB requests that never block (the old SMBlock
and friends).
Discovered something interesting about the strange
NT_STATUS_FILE_LOCK_CONFLICT return. If we asked
for a lock with zero timeout, and we got an error
of NT_STATUS_FILE_LOCK_CONFLICT, treat it as though
it was a blocking lock with a timeout of 150 - 300ms.
This only happens when timeout is sent as zero and
can be seen quite clearly in ethereal. This is the
real replacement for old do_lock_spin() code.
Re-worked the blocking lock select timeout to correctly
use milliseconds instead of the old second level
resolution (far too coarse for this work).
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit b81d6d1ae95a3d3e449dde629884b565eac289d9)
test. Phew - that was painful :-). But what it means
is that we now implement lock cancels and I can add
lock cancels into POSIX lock handling which will fix
the fast/slow system call issue with cifsfs !
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit f1a9cf075b87c76c032d19da0168424c90f6cb3c)
to do the upper layer directories but this is what
everyone is waiting for....
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit 9dafb7f48ca3e7af956b0a7d1720c2546fc4cfb8)
