IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Remove the following entry in knownfail.d/posix_infolevel_fails.
samba3.blackbox.inherit_owner.*.NT1.*verify.*unix\ owner.*
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Cope with the minor difference in wildcard search return when
we're actually using SMB1+POSIX on the server (SMB1+POSIX treats
all directory search paths as wildcards).
Remove the following entries in knownfail.d/posix_infolevel_fails.
samba3.unix.info2.info2\(nt4_dc_smb1\)
samba3.unix.info2.info2\(ad_dc_smb1\)
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Remove the following entry in knownfail.d/posix_infolevel_fails.
^samba3.raw.search.one\ file\ search.*
from knownfail.d/posix_infolevel_fails
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Add knownfail file
knownfail.d/posix_infolevel_fails
for tests that don't currently negotiate
SMB1+POSIX before using SMB1+POSIX calls.
These are:
samba3.smbtorture_s3.plain.POSIX-BLOCKING-LOCK.smbtorture\(nt4_dc_smb1\)
samba3.blackbox.acl_xattr.NT1.nt_affects_posix.*
samba3.blackbox.acl_xattr.NT1.nt_affects_chown.*
samba3.blackbox.acl_xattr.NT1.nt_affects_chgrp.*
samba3.blackbox.inherit_owner.*.NT1.*verify.*unix\ owner.*
samba3.unix.info2.info2\(nt4_dc_smb1\)
samba3.unix.info2.info2\(ad_dc_smb1\)
samba3.raw.search.one\ file\ search.*
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
This is the big switch to use samba-dcerpcd for the RPC services in
source3/. It is a pretty big and unordered patch, but I don't see a
good way to split this up into more manageable pieces without
sacrificing bisectability even more. Probably I could cut out a few
small ones, but a major architechtural switch like this will always be
messy.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Cabrero <scabrero@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
These are rpcd_* binaries.
rpcd_classic collects everything that's not specific
Changes the epmapper to read the epmdb.tdb, which will make the
epmapper tests non-bisectable until the switch is done.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Cabrero <scabrero@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
is_known_pipename() will be removed soon
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Cabrero <scabrero@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This is pre WindowXP SMB1 functionality, and we
need to remove this from the server in order to
move towards SMB2-only, so the test must go.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
This flag should be ignored and the FAST armor key used instead.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This is not necessary for testing FAST, and was causing some of the
tests to fail.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Dec 7 04:54:35 UTC 2021 on sn-devel-184
Using a SPN should only be permitted if it is also a UPN, and is not an
enterprise principal.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14912
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Dec 2 14:49:35 UTC 2021 on sn-devel-184
We should not fail this just because the user doesn't have
permissions on the share root.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14788
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Dec 1 11:51:50 UTC 2021 on sn-devel-184
Demonstrate that smbd fails FSCTL_QUERY_NETWORK_INTERFACE_INFO
only because the user doesn't have permissions on the share root.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14788
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
smbd_smb2_request_process_ioctl() already detailed checks for file_ids,
which not reached before.
.allow_invalid_fileid = true was only used for SMB2_OP_IOCTL.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14788
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
An invalid file id for FSCTL_QUERY_NETWORK_INTERFACE_INFO gives
INVALID_PARAMETER instead of FILE_CLOSED.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14788
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
We should not send more data than the client requested.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14788
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
It seems that we currently don't have BUFFER_TOO_SMALL handling
for FSCTL/IOCTL calls.
FSCTL_QUERY_NETWORK_INTERFACE_INFO is just an easy example
to demonstrate it.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14788
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
We should not fail this just because the user doesn't have permissions
on the share root.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14788
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Demonstrate that smbd fails FSCTL_VALIDATE_NEGOTIATE_INFO
only because the user doesn't have permissions on the share root.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14788
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Over the last month I got more and more reports,
that it's not possible to use a custom Samba version
on systems with sssd being installed, which depends on some
specific samba libraries installed in the system.
One major problem is that the custom libnss_winbind.so.2
depends on the libreplace-samba4.so of the custom build
and also injects an RPATH into the running process.
When sssd uses any nss library call it will get this,
when it then tries to load some of its plugins via dlopen(),
e.g.
ldd /usr/lib64/sssd/libsss_ad.so| grep samba
libsamba-util.so.0 => /lib64/libsamba-util.so.0
libreplace-samba4.so => /usr/lib64/samba/libreplace-samba4.so
libsamba-security-samba4.so => /usr/lib64/samba/libsamba-security-samba4.so
libsamba-errors.so.1 => /lib64/libsamba-errors.so.1
libsamba-debug-samba4.so => /usr/lib64/samba/libsamba-debug-samba4.so
libgenrand-samba4.so => /usr/lib64/samba/libgenrand-samba4.so
libsocket-blocking-samba4.so => /usr/lib64/samba/libsocket-blocking-samba4.so
libtime-basic-samba4.so => /usr/lib64/samba/libtime-basic-samba4.so
libsys-rw-samba4.so => /usr/lib64/samba/libsys-rw-samba4.so
libiov-buf-samba4.so => /usr/lib64/samba/libiov-buf-samba4.so
When that loads dlopen() will fail as a soname libreplace-samba4.so is
already loaded, but the symbol version within the other one don't match, as the
contain the exact version, e.g. replace_dummy@@SAMBA_4.13.3.
This is just an example and similar things can happen in all situations
where we provide libraries, which are potentially injected into every
process of the running system. These should only depend on libc.so and
related basic system libraries in order to avoid the problem.
We have the following libraries, which are in the that category:
- libnss_winbind.so.2
- libnss_wins.so.2
- pam_winbind.so
- winbind_krb5_locator.so
- async_dns_krb5_locator.so
The rules of library loading are really complex and symbol versioning
is not enough to solve it, only the combination of unique soname and
unique symbol version suffix seem to solve the problem, but injecting
an RPATH is still a problem.
In order to solve the problem I experimented with adding SAMBA_SUBSYSTEM()
definitions with 'hide_symbols=True' in order to do some static linking
of selected components, e.g.
bld.SAMBA_SUBSYSTEM('replace-hidden',
source=REPLACE_SOURCE,
group='base_libraries',
hide_symbols=True,
deps='dl attr' + extra_libs)
It's relatively simple to get to the point where the following are
completely static:
- libnss_winbind.so.2
- libnss_wins.so.2
- pam_winbind.so
- winbind_krb5_locator.so
But 'async_dns_krb5_locator.so' links in almost everything!
It seems we install the krb5 plugins into our own $MODULESDIR/krb5/,
so it may not be so critical, as long it's the admin who created
the desired symlinks into the location the kerberos libraries search
for plugins. Note the at least the locator plugins are always loaded
without any configuration, every .so in a special path are loaded with dlopen().
This is done by every application using kerberos, so we load a lot of samba libraries
into them.
Packagers should not put async_dns_krb5_locator.so (nor a symlink) into
the path that's reachable by libkrb5.so.
As a longterm solution we may want to change async_dns_krb5_locator.so
to use a helper process with posix_spawn() instead of doing everything
within the process.
Note I added hiden_symbols=True to the nss modules for Linux and
FreeBSD only, because these are the only platforms I'm able to test
on. We most likely should do the same on other platforms, but some
with access to the platform should provide a tested patch.
In order to avoid manual definitions of SAMBA_SUBSYSTEMS() with
'-hidden', I added the 'provide_builtin_linking=True' option,
as the logic is very similar to what we already have with the
'--builtin-libraries=BUILTIN_LIBRARIES' configure option.
SAMBA_PLUGIN() is used in order to use SAMBA_LIBRARY() in order
to make it more strict that these plugins can't be used as
normal depedency by other subsystems and libraries.
While being there it was easy enough to make libwbclient.so
also standalone without dependecies to other samba libraries.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14780
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Nov 30 03:33:26 UTC 2021 on sn-devel-184
Normally samba_wdc_get_pac() is used to generate the PAC for a TGT, but
when generating a service ticket for S4U2Self, we want to avoid adding
the additional PAC_ATTRIBUTES_INFO and PAC_REQUESTER_SID buffers.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
If we decided not to put a PAC into the ticket, mspac would be NULL
here, and the resulting ticket would not contain a PAC. This could
happen if there was a request to omit the PAC or the service did not
require authorization data. Ensure that we always generate a PAC.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Windows ignores PAC_TYPE_ATTRIBUTES_INFO and always issues a PAC when
presented with an RODC-issued TGT. By removing this PAC buffer from
RODC-issued tickets, we ensure that an RODC-issued ticket will still
result in a PAC if it is first renewed or validated by the main DC.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This reverts commit fa4c9bcefdeed0a7106aab84df20b02435febc1f.
We should not be generating these additional PAC buffers for service
tickets, only for TGTs.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We set EXPECT_EXTRA_PAC_BUFFERS to 0 for the moment. This signifies that
these checks are currently not enforced, which avoids a lot of test
failures.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
