IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Two new torture parameters:
* smbexit_pdu_support: if the Server supports the Exit command
* range_not_locked_on_file_close: whether the server returns the
NT_STATUS_RANGE_NOT_LOCKED error when a file is closed which has a
pending lock request. Windows returns this error, though per the
spec, this error should only be returned to an unlock request.
It appears some newer versions of windows return
NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND on a createfile when access is denied
rather than NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. I'm not sure how this translates
to directory enumeration yet, but for now make this a parameter that
can be checked in the various torture tests.
This also gets RAW-ACLS and SMB2-CREATE passing against win7.
- Change RAW-ACLS test suite so each test can be run individually.
- Add verify_sd() and verify_attrib() helper functions.
- Change test_nttrans_create() to work for both files and directories.
- Fix a segfault in test_inheritance() when the test errors out early.
- test_sd_get_set() does not pass against XP or Vista, so it is no longer added
to the RAW-ACLS test suite.
- Minor fixes to test_inheritance().
- New INHERITFLAGS test, which tests the auto inheritance flags a bit more.
- printf -> torture_comment / torture_warning / torture_result
Try a rename with a wide-open share mode on an already open file
and the there is still share mode contention. For the reason why
see:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/os_fileservices/thread/3ca14dc9-da1f-4786-a8f7-a86e9903db0c
Msft's anser:
After further review, The reason for server to fail with sharing
violation is that the windows server that executes a path-based
rename request opens the file for DELETE access, but only with
FILE_SHARED_READ as ShareAccess . Therefore, the existing
open(frame 76), which has shared read/write/delete , is compatible
with the Windows servers access mode (DELETE), but Windows servers
open is not compatible with access mode in existing open.
Note that it is correct to state that the logic in Windows server
could have been written to allow shared read/write/delete in which
case it would succeed as you mention. The behavior here is
historical based on the existing implementation.
Some servers choose to mark a client as bad if they fail an oplock
break request by timing out (win7 is an example). Once the client is
marked as bad, future oplock requests will timeout instantly. This
causes subsequent runs of this test to fail, so rather than erroring
out as a failure, a warning is printed instead.
There is also a bug in w2k3 where it was incorrectly returning
contending a share mode lock. It worked in XP and has been re-fixed
in win7.
This can also now be run against samba3.
See what happens when we have multiple outstanding lock requests and
we try to cancel both of them within a single LockingAndX.
On Windows, it seems only the first lock in the array is cancelled,
and the second is left pending. Though, this behavior goes against
the MS-CIFS spec.
* test that 2 locks in a single LockAndX are transactional
* test that 1 unlock and 1 lock in a single LockAndX are not
transactional
* test that SMB2 doesn't like mixed lock/unlock in a single
PDU
Abstract the server requirements to pass some BRL tests.
* The new default for >64bit lock tests, is that the server should
return STATUS_INVALID_LOCK_RANGE.
* Add parameter for targets that don't implement DENY_DOS
In light of the INVALID_LEVEL that is seen for RAW_SFILEINFO_END_OF_FILE_INFO
requests on a path, I'm changing these back to using the passthrough
RAW_SFILEINFO_END_OF_FILE_INFORMATION to test the oplock break behavior as
originally intended
It turns out setting the end-of-file with Trans2SetPathInfo using the
snia spec's info level will attempt to open the file, enforcing share
modes, but then subsequentlys fail the setpathinfo with a dos error of
INVALID_LEVEL. Doing a Trans2SetFileInfo with either end-of-file info
level succeeds as expected.
