IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This is what e.g. Windows 10 does a lot.
Guenther
Signed-off-by: Guenther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12245
(cherry picked from commit 518b2a3f5f3a4814e96546505487b775b5dbca40)
According to the documentation the commands should look like
"IDTOSID UID xxxx" instead of "UID xxxx".
This fixes changes of commit b4239ca096738f553b0f9d7fa6aaa4219b72ef7f:
idmap_script: Parallelize script calls
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12194
Signed-off-by: Björn Baumbach <bb@sernet.de>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Sep 6 19:32:57 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
(cherry picked from commit 4f654acad01dbb1b17e933a855bb53ea6a7bb34d)
When "ignore system acls" is set to "yes, we need to ensure filesystem
permission always grant access so that when doing our own access checks
we don't run into situations where we grant access but the filesystem
doesn't.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12181
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Aug 31 18:41:20 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
(cherry picked from commit b72287514cc78c9019db7385af4c9b9d94f60894)
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12181
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit cbe8f0d63b90e4380da35e9f9f5a05d8ccc2058b)
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12177
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 11dddd59aa01195152199443bc26e3141f162c8f)
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12177
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 946b93d0e3f6f23fa2325d7aaba4dc6f4cc17cb6)
Reintroduce Windows style default ACL, but this time as an optional
feature, not changing default behaviour.
Original bugreport that got reverted because it changed the default
behaviour: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12028
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12177
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 0730cb7e1ce33dbc5fc48a7363204c1220400c68)
Existing behaviour is "posix" style. Next commit will (re)add the
"windows" style. This commit doesn't change behaviour in any way.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12177
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 26a9867ae1a9c69659252ce03c280c7c18a6c58f)
If ignore_system_acls is set and we're synthesizing a default ACL, we
were fetching the filesystem ACL just to free it again. This change
avoids this.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12177
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit f46179ef7310959af095b0ea6234df7523d15457)
Will be reused in the next commit when moving the
make_default_filesystem_acl() stuff to a different place.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12177
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 10959698e20de381beec7ab532c8bdc32fa6401c)
Better for performance and a subsequent commit will add one more option
where this will pay off.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12177
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 61c3d2124fb1a180fae4c8c0b5ab5b32bd56c8ad)
No change in behaviour.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12177
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 0de5a128cee90694979d074c2590ddbca0071e82)
No change in behaviour (hopefully! :-). This paves the way for moving
the ACL blob validation to a helper function in the next commit.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12177
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 335527c647331148927feea2a7ae2f2c88986bc6)
The variables are already set to NULL by TALLOC_FREE.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12177
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit e6f1254a00a6bf85b8d95bfbafef7d3e39ce1dde)
In most realistic cases the "next" VFS op will return the permissions
from the filesystem. This rename makes it explicit where the SD is
originating from. No change in behaviour.
This just paves the way for a later change that will simplify the whole
logic and talloc hierarchy.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12177
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 9f79084f166208820f586c8e43e1e315d32cd5ce)
This makes it explicit where the SD is originating from. No change in
behaviour.
This just paves the way for a later change that will simplify the whole
logic and talloc hierarchy, therefor this also strictly renames the
occurences after the out label.
Logically, behind the out label, we're dealing with a variable that
points to what we're going to return, so the name psd_blob is
misleading, but I'm desperately trying to avoid logic changes in this
commit and therefor I'm just strictly renaming.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12177
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 2367eea928593f12f8914f7e7ba613b1b15516de)
This reverts commit 961c4b591bb102751079d9cc92d7aa1c37f1958c.
Subsequent commits will add the same functionality as an optional
feature.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12177
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 590b80490c00587b5a4035856891e10defb654f6)
A shared rpc modules directory may not exist if all RPC modules are built
static.
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12184
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 58889e04bd545d7420d1193e134351bd0ccb8430)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11994
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Christian Ambach <ambi@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Christian Ambach <ambi@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Sep 2 18:10:44 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
(cherry picked from commit 9b45ba5cd53bd513eb777590815a0b8408af64e2)
This only tests something on local daemons, since the configuration
can't be easily manipulated on a real cluster.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12180
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
Reviewed-by: Amitay Isaacs <amitay@gmail.com>
Autobuild-User(master): Amitay Isaacs <amitay@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Sep 1 17:15:06 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
(cherry picked from commit 625f080f213d03fd4b08e1b6ff9f1415f77ee73b)
Autobuild-User(v4-5-test): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(v4-5-test): Tue Sep 6 12:18:42 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
If there's configuration in the environment then daemons_start()
should use a temporary configuration file with that appended.
This means that global overrides don't (harmlessly) build up in the
configuration file during each test and individual tests can override
configuration when calling daemons_start() directly.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12180
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
Reviewed-by: Amitay Isaacs <amitay@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7885b9652fcb3b30361a8b2e0b4688c261b55065)
If *async_reply isn't set then the calling code will reply to the
control and free the control structure. In some places the control
structure pointer is stolen onto state before a synchronous exit due
to an error condition. The error handling then frees state and
returns an error. The calling code will access-after-free when trying
to reply to the control.
To make this easier to understand, the convention is that any
(immediate) error results in a synchronous reply to the control via an
error return code AND *async_reply not being set. In this case the
control structure pointer should never be stolen onto state. State is
never used for a synchronous reply, it is only ever used by a
callback.
Also initialise state->c to NULL so that any premature call to a
callback (e.g. in an immediate error path) is more obvious.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12180
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
Reviewed-by: Amitay Isaacs <amitay@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9d975b860d52030a702723c70791c6a2829107c0)
The callback should never be called before an immediate return. The
callback might reply to a control and the caller of
ctdb_event_script_callback_v() may not have assigned/stolen the
pointer to control structure into the private data. Therefore,
calling the callback can dereference an uninitialised pointer to the
control structure when attempting to reply.
An event script isn't being run until the child has been forked. So
update relevant state and set the destructor after this.
If the child can't be forked then free the state and return with an
error. The callback will not be called and the caller will process
the error correctly.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12180
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
Reviewed-by: Amitay Isaacs <amitay@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 582518c7e89b279e34147bdb0b04b73056fac048)
The callback should never be called before an immediate return. The
callback might reply to a control and the caller of
ctdb_event_script_callback_v() may not have assigned/stolen the
pointer to control structure into the private data. Therefore,
calling the callback can dereference an uninitialised pointer to the
control structure when attempting to reply.
ctdb_event_script_callback_v() must succeed when there are no event
scripts. On success the caller will mark the call as asynchronous and
expect the callback to be called. Given that it can't be called
before return then it needs to be scheduled.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12180
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
Reviewed-by: Amitay Isaacs <amitay@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9076c44f35bf309b9e183bae98829f7154b93f33)
Otherwise, anything that the transaction has already done to the DB will be left in the DB
even despite the failure. For example, if a fix wrote to the DB, but then failed a post-write
check, then the fix will not be unrolled.
This is because we do not have nested transactions in TDB.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12178
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Aug 29 12:46:21 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
(cherry picked from commit db32a0e5ea8f652857e45480cc31ecb1ef884c1a)
dbcheck of the rid pool (CN=RID Set) for another server will otherwise fail because
rIDNextRid is not replicated, and so it not present
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12178
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 9d0c869e36ba2f43fd2ed4cd090b48102d499bc8)
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Sep 2 22:05:33 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
(cherry picked from commit e0ef054fa94b0dd56ec7bf92ffea0a6d7609da56)
Autobuild-User(v4-5-test): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(v4-5-test): Mon Sep 5 15:07:40 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(v4-5-test): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(v4-5-test): Mon Aug 29 12:15:37 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
With a binary search, this can only be tested on 3+ elements.
Pair-programmed-with: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Bob Campbell <bobcampbell@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Garming Sam <garming@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Aug 25 14:22:25 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12187
(cherry picked from commit cb243d86d892cb148d01dd87f29f86f3e2c1ebd0)
This doesn't fix the partialAttrSetEx case, so the test is left in the
knownfail file.
Signed-off-by: Bob Campbell <bobcampbell@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12187
(cherry picked from commit 1a96f9329e718acac195e75a5156b1c147ad54ff)
This has an odd behaviour where PartialAttrSetEx does not respect the
incoming mapping. PartialAttrSetEx is not respected in Samba at all.
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12187
(cherry picked from commit 36df826154ed90e92f877e6f36269893c44a2a16)
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12187
(cherry picked from commit e495d1b2ed9aca45ce696dd8cc54458002ca0c3a)
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12187
(cherry picked from commit 1f4ea1686ff1575406b5e8e488feb7b900db12ef)
On Windows this does not seem to fail, but causes silent errors.
Pair-programmed-with: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Bob Campbell <bobcampbell@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12187
(cherry picked from commit 7f3ef150751452411db1e0c5b2ca6d8af2769d5c)
This will cause silent errors in the translation, but as far as we know,
Windows will accept it just fine.
Pair-programmed-with: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Bob Campbell <bobcampbell@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12187
(cherry picked from commit 1673590e8ec3001c6909a78e004f64433060a624)
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12187
(cherry picked from commit 0ea126c63c1d5a0081b90a914c9ad7227cf7b748)
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12187
(cherry picked from commit 317bbc4d0528dca03d94d61c38b038d314f8cad8)
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12187
(cherry picked from commit 216c0319c744c39848ae5da7d15dccb6769ea20a)
Pair-programmed-with: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Bob Campbell <bobcampbell@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12187
(cherry picked from commit 9563dab562cb2dfe4c226f03156bec0bf6eef847)
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12187
(cherry picked from commit fd49b44e0296348c835168f336297fd969e63c50)
This file was about updating early Samba AD alpha versions.
We describe all important things related to the update process in the Wiki:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba
Signed-off-by: Marc Muehlfeld <mmuehlfeld@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Aug 29 03:28:11 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
(cherry picked from commit 38696630552d449ec3c8e1fbdf6fb8212a96d2c9)
In the Wiki we give more details and describe what the user needs to
do to fix the attributes.
Signed-off-by: Marc Muehlfeld <mmuehlfeld@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
With a binary search, this can only be tested on 3+ elements.
Pair-programmed-with: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Bob Campbell <bobcampbell@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Garming Sam <garming@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Aug 25 14:22:25 CEST 2016 on sn-devel-144
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12187
(cherry picked from commit cb243d86d892cb148d01dd87f29f86f3e2c1ebd0)
