IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
We can now remove our existing decompression implementation in Python.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Jan 10 21:18:01 UTC 2023 on sn-devel-184
There are four functions, allowing compression and decompression in
the two formats we support so far. The functions will accept bytes or
unicode strings which are treated as utf-8.
The LZ77+Huffman decompression algorithm requires an exact target
length to decompress, so this is mandatory.
The plain decompression algorithm does not need an exact length, but
you can provide one to help it know how much space to allocate. As
currently written, you can provide a short length and it will often
succeed in decompressing to a different shorter string.
These bindings are intended to make ad-hoc investigation easier, not
for production use. This is reflected in the guesses about output size
that plain_decompress() makes if you don't supply one -- either they
are stupidly wasteful or ridiculously insufficient, depending on
whether or not you were trying to decompress a 20MB string.
>>> a = '12345678'
>>> import compression
>>> b = compression.huffman_compress(a)
>>> b
b'\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 #....
>>> len(b)
262
>>> c = compression.huffman_decompress(b, len(a))
>>> c
b'12345678' # note, c is bytes, a is str
>>> a
'12345678'
>>> d = compression.plain_compress(a)
>>> d
b'\xff\xff\xff\x0012345678'
>>> compression.plain_decompress(d) # no size specified, guesses
b'12345678'
>>> compression.plain_decompress(d,5)
b'12345'
>>> compression.plain_decompress(d,0) # 0 for auto
b'12345678'
>>> compression.plain_decompress(d,1)
b'1'
>>> compression.plain_decompress(a,444)
Traceback (most recent call last):
compression.CompressionError: unable to decompress data into a buffer of 444 bytes.
>>> compression.plain_decompress(b,444)
b'\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00 #...
That last one decompresses the Huffman compressed file with the plain
compressor; pretty much any string is valid for plain decompression.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Making these variables hidden prevents the parent
class gp_chromium_ext from reading them when
subclassed in gp_chrome_ext. This caused the
chrome policies to be installed in the chromium
directories.
Signed-off-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Dec 21 03:05:46 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
A bug cropped up in the rsop that was causing a
crash because this wasn't being tested.
Signed-off-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
The output must be a string value, or it will
crash. Chromium policies output integers, which
was causing the parser to crash.
Signed-off-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This test exercises the gp_file_applier and
ensures that when a policy is modified, no old
policy is left behind.
Signed-off-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Currently applied files which are manually
removed do not get re-applied.
Signed-off-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This is currently a significant drawback of Samba
Group Policy. CSEs MUST be aware of policy changes
such as modification, removal, etc. This is a
complex process, and is easy to mess up. Here I
add 'appliers' (the first being for files), which
handle the complexty transparently to ensure this
is done correctly.
Signed-off-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Dec 20 01:32:07 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
This file must be readable by all users,
otherwise the policy doesn't get read or applied.
Signed-off-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This allows the tests to be executed without an explicit
PYTHONPATH="bin/python".
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15237
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Dec 13 14:06:14 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
For now it only allows the admin to modify
the msDS-SupportedEncryptionTypes values.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15237
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
In order to allow better upgrades we need the default value for smb.conf to the
same even if the effective default value of the software changes in future.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15237
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This tests work out the difference between
- msDS-SupportedEncryptionTypes value or it's default
- software defined extra flags for DC accounts
- accounts with only an nt hash being stored
- the resulting value in the KRB5_PADATA_SUPPORTED_ETYPES announcement
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13135
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15237
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15237
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This will allow us to create tests accounts with only an nt4 hash
stored, without any aes keys.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15237
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15237
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15237
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This shows that changes around RC4 encryption types do not break older
functional levels where only RC4 keys are available.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15237
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
ENC_HMAC_SHA1_96_AES256_SK is a flag introduced for by Microsoft in this CVE
to indicate that additionally, AES session keys are available.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15237
Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Extend the RC4 Protected Users tests to use different preauth etypes.
This helps test the nuances of the new expected behaviour and allows the
tests to continue passing.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15237
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
As we will assume, as part of the fixes for CVE-2022-37966, that trust
objects with no msDS-SupportedEncryptionTypes attribute support AES
keys, RC4 support must now be explicitly indicated.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15237
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This option does the opposite of what the documentation claims.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15237
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15231
Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
The KDC should leave the choice of ticket encryption type up to the
target service, and admit no influence from the client.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15237
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This lets us select the encryption types we claim to support in the
request body.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15237
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We will use it for testing our handling of encryption types.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15237
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This makes it easier to test against a server that is not accessible via DNS.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15237
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
A new file will shorlty fail as it is binary input
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14929
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
