IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This patch is the second iteration of an inside-out conversion to cleanup
functions in charcnv.c returning size_t == -1 to indicate failure.
(This used to be commit 6b189dabc5)
Calling tdb_traverse inside a transaction led to the transaction lock being
held indefinitely. This was caused by the tdb_transaction_lock/unlock inside
tdb_traverse: The transaction code holds the global lock at offset
TRANSACTION_LOCK. The call to tdb_transaction_lock does nothing because the
transaction_lock is already being held. tdb_transaction_unlock inside tdb_wrap
resets tdb->have_transaction_lock but does not release the kernel-level fcntl
lock. transaction_commit later on does not release that fcntl lock either,
because tdb->have_transaction_lock was already reset by tdb_transaction().
This patch does fix that problem for me. An alternative would be to make
tdb->have_transaction_lock a counter that can cope with proper nesting, maybe
in other places as well.
Volker
(This used to be commit 80e700e3bd)
I have no idea what I've been smoking when I checked this in :-(
Karolin, this fixes the join bug 3.0.28->3.2.0rc1
Thanks,
Volker
(This used to be commit f845dbbcee)
Log when we kill other smbd sessions like when we hit the VC == 0 case.
This one fixes BUG #5476.
Initial patch from Björn Jacke <bj@sernet.de>.
Karolin
(This used to be commit 1429f3b7cf)
by name code from conn, we were already doing the
same check in the dfs_redirect() function, so move
it into parse_dfs_path() instead.
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit 8a7c6df122)
This works around a problem with smbcontrol opening messaging.tdb twice. Very
likely this is not the right fix. Michael, please check.
Volker
(This used to be commit 9d52cf3f93)
There's no point to block these, winbind will ignore them anyway.
Jerry, Jeremy, we definitely need a chance to trigger a reconnection attempt
after a DC has been rebooted. Right now winbind's reaction to a single rebooted
DC is to declare it offline. It will not try before a "winbind cache timeout"
timeout. If the admin sets this to an hour or longer for performance reasons,
we're screwed. Reboot your DC, no logon for an hour.
Volker
(This used to be commit cb065a8995)