IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Re-enable TLS in the default configuration. We passed on the build
farm because we have an explicit diffie-hilliman parameters file set.
Andrew Bartlett
emacs compile mode (hint, paste to a file, and compile as "cat
filename").
This allowed me to fix nearly all the warnings for a IA_64 SuSE build
very quickly.
routines to return an NTSTATUS. This should help track down errors.
Use a bit of talloc_steal and talloc_unlink to get the real socket to
be a child of the GENSEC or TLS socket.
Always return a new socket, even for the 'pass-though' case.
Andrew Bartlett
contexts from the application layer into the socket layer.
This improves a number of correctness aspects, as we now allow LDAP
packets to cross multiple SASL packets. It should also make it much
easier to write async LDAP tests from windows clients, as they use SASL
by default. It is also vital to allowing OpenLDAP clients to use GSSAPI
against Samba4, as it negotiates a rather small SASL buffer size.
This patch mirrors the earlier work done to move TLS into the socket
layer.
Unusual in this pstch is the extra read callback argument I take. As
SASL is a layer on top of a socket, it is entirely possible for the
SASL layer to drain a socket dry, but for the caller not to have read
all the decrypted data. This would leave the system without an event
to restart the read (as the socket is dry).
As such, I re-invoke the read handler from a timed callback, which
should trigger on the next running of the event loop. I believe that
the TLS code does require a similar callback.
In trying to understand why this is required, imagine a SASL-encrypted
LDAP packet in the following formation:
+-----------------+---------------------+
| SASL Packet #1 | SASL Packet #2 |
----------------------------------------+
| LDAP Packet #1 | LDAP Packet #2 |
----------------------------------------+
In the old code, this was illegal, but it is perfectly standard
SASL-encrypted LDAP. Without the callback, we would read and process
the first LDAP packet, and the SASL code would have read the second SASL
packet (to decrypt enough data for the LDAP packet), and no data would
remain on the socket.
Without data on the socket, read events stop. That is why I add timed
events, until the SASL buffer is drained.
Another approach would be to add a hack to the event system, to have it
pretend there remained data to read off the network (but that is ugly).
In improving the code, to handle more real-world cases, I've been able
to remove almost all the special-cases in the testnonblock code. The
only special case is that we must use a deterministic partial packet
when calling send, rather than a random length. (1 + n/2). This is
needed because of the way the SASL and TLS code works, and the 'resend
on failure' requirements.
Andrew Bartlett
This reduces caller complexity, because the TLS code is now called
just like any other socket. (A new socket context is returned by the
tls_init_server and tls_init_client routines).
When TLS is not available, the original socket is returned.
Andrew Bartlett
the difference between these at all, and in the future the
fact that INIT_OBJ_FILES include smb_build.h will be sufficient to
have recompiles at the right time.
at every single build. Run 'scons configure=1' or delete sconf.cache
to force checks to be re-run.
Jelmer, I think this stuff is cached in the .sconf_cache directory but
the message is still displayed and it looks like it caches the compiled
test object file not the actual result of the test.
- got rid of the special cases for sasl buffers
- added a tls_socket_pending() call to determine how much data is waiting on a tls connection
- removed the attempt at async handling of ldap calls. The buffers/sockets are all async, but the calls themselves
are sync.
