IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This is also used as part of 'ethtool -n rdma14' and
'ethtool -x rdma14'.
;#> ethtool -n rdma14
8 RX rings available
rxclass: Cannot get RX class rule count: Operation not supported
RX classification rule retrieval failed
;#> ethtool -x rdma14
RX flow hash indirection table for rdma14 with 8 RX ring(s):
0: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
RSS hash key:
Operation not supported
RSS hash function:
toeplitz: on
xor: off
crc32: off
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
I'm not sure if struct initializers would take care of padding,
so I use ZERO_STRUCT().
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Prevents a segfault in load_interfaces() when total interfaces == 1.
Fixes regression caused by da68a1b2f4.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13665
Signed-off-by: David Mulder <dmulder@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Oct 28 00:35:35 CEST 2018 on sn-devel-144
Currently these dependencies are indirect via a SAMBA_SUBSYSTEM
which does not propagate private library information. This results
in these 2 libraries getting generated with no RPATH information
in the ELF header.
Additional discussion [1].
[1] -
https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2017-January/118078.html
Signed-off-by: Zentaro Kavanagh <zentaro@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Jan 23 08:26:43 CET 2017 on sn-devel-144
Found by Coverity
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Dec 3 03:40:53 CET 2016 on sn-devel-144
Valgrind reports the following:
==26599== Syscall param ioctl(SIOCETHTOOL) points to uninitialised byte(s)
==26599== at 0x7014707: ioctl (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.22.so)
==26599== by 0x79D1585: query_iface_speed_from_name (interfaces.c:152)
==26599== by 0x79D1BBA: _get_interfaces (interfaces.c:277)
==26599== by 0x79D1E80: get_interfaces (interfaces.c:368)
==26599== by 0x508A7E3: load_interfaces (interface.c:612)
==26599== by 0x150B30: main (net.c:963)
==26599== Address 0xffefff0d8 is on thread 1's stack
==26599== in frame #1, created by query_iface_speed_from_name
(interfaces.c:130)
==26599==
==26599== Syscall param ioctl(SIOCETHTOOL) points to uninitialised byte(s)
==26599== at 0x7014707: ioctl (in /usr/lib64/libc-2.22.so)
==26599== by 0x79D15CC: query_iface_speed_from_name (interfaces.c:164)
==26599== by 0x79D1BBA: _get_interfaces (interfaces.c:277)
==26599== by 0x79D1E80: get_interfaces (interfaces.c:368)
==26599== by 0x508A7E3: load_interfaces (interface.c:612)
==26599== by 0x150B30: main (net.c:963)
==26599== Address 0xffefff0d8 is on thread 1's stack
==26599== in frame #1, created by query_iface_speed_from_name
(interfaces.c:130)
Guenther
Signed-off-by: Guenther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
_get_interfaces() function from interfaces.c uses if_speed
variable to store interface speed and is initialized with a
default value at start. But if_speed populated via one
iteration for a specific IP address will be treated as the
default value for next iteration which is wrong. Therefore
change is to move the initialization cum declaration of
if_speed inside iteration of IP addresses loop.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11734
Signed-off-by: Anoop C S <anoopcs@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Feb 13 16:22:22 CET 2016 on sn-devel-144
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Feb 4 00:35:11 CET 2016 on sn-devel-144
Pair-Programmed-With: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Anoop C S <anoopcs@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Pair-Programmed-With: Anoop C S <anoopcs@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Anoop C S <anoopcs@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Pair-Programmed-With: Anoop C S <anoopcs@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Anoop C S <anoopcs@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This patch should address the problem with Link Local addresses
on FreeBSD and Linux.
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <rsharpe@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Feb 28 20:56:57 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
"The 6to4 interface has the flags IFF_POINTTOPOINT interface but no
ifa_dstaddr as it's not at the IPv6 level a point to point interface
(at least from my understanding), as we don't have a IFF_BROADCAST
flag set (I have the impression that this flag is only set on a
interface that has also an IPv4 address) the first test is not valid
also, which result in a skipped interface."
