IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
pointers in the composite code type safe.
This is a bit of an experiement, I'd be interested in comments on
whether we should use this more widely.
(This used to be commit 0e1da827b380998355f75f4ef4f424802059c278)
the minimal level I think (one private pointer for the composite
function, and one private pointer for the caller)
(This used to be commit 0240bf928163e32e7c69be88fe3ed4987dd18778)
proliferation of void* in the composite code. This removes two of the
void* pointers from the main composite structure.
(This used to be commit 5a89a5ed0fa022fb380bf72065904633270f34aa)
have composite functions that are not made up of functions that
operate on smbcli_request structures.
(This used to be commit 4f6055b4fb7e287a29544ff1ca4e22f698efc478)
which combineds ntcreatex, readx and close into a single call that
behaves just like a normal libcli async call.
(This used to be commit 516f68fb054f0717f0429e031aa820776ecc6597)