IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Shows we fail sending an SMB2_OP_FLUSH + SMB2_OP_FLUSH
compound if we immediately close the file afterward.
Internally the flushes go async and we free the req, then
we process the close. When the flushes complete they try to access
already freed data.
Extra test which will allow me to test when the final
component (flush) of the compound goes async and returns
NT_STATUS_PENDING.
Add knownfail.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15172
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 6f149dfd9d8d2619a9e18975ebcf5e69df2b7766)
Shows we fail sending an SMB2_OP_FLUSH + SMB2_OP_CLOSE
compound. Internally the flush goes async and
we free the req, then we process the close.
When the flush completes it tries to access
already freed data.
Found using the Apple MacOSX client at SNIA SDC 2022.
Add knownfail.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15172
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
(back-ported from commit 17a110c1b58196eb8ecf3c76eb97e8508976c544)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15252
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit fdb19ce8aa189f6cfbd2d1fd7ed6fe809ba93cf3)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15153
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 9b2d28157107602fcbe659664cf9ca25f08bb30b)
smb2_composite_setpathinfo() uses SEC_FLAG_MAXIMUM_ALLOWED which can
have unwanted side effects like breaking oplocks if the effective access
includes [READ|WRITE]_DATA.
For changing the DOS attributes we only need SEC_FILE_WRITE_ATTRIBUTE. With this
change test_smb2_oplock_batch25() doesn't trigger an oplock break anymore.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15153
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 66e40690bdd41800a01333ce4243bd62ee2b1894)
A subsequent commit adds another streams test named "attributes2", this change
avoids matching the new testname with the existing knownfail entries.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15126
MR: https://gitlab.com/samba-team/samba/-/merge_requests/2643
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit b5848d391be4f7633745d9c36e432ac8b1c9dba2)
This demonstrates the bug that happens with a
write to a file handle holding an R lease,
while there are other openers without any lease.
When one of the other openers writes to the file,
the R lease of the only lease holder isn't broken to NONE.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15148
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 9e5ff607eb1b9c45c8836d3cff9d51b418740b87)
Passes against Windows. Shows that Windows allows a durable handle
on a leased open for READ_ATTRUBUTES only (a stat open).
Mark as knownfail for now.
NB. Not sure why we are testing smb2.durable-open against ad_dc
as that provisioning has "smb2 leases = no" which precludes
granting durable handles. Not changing for this bug but this
should be looked at in future.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15042
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit bb329d4de505d2c01ba45a06311c9dc6d87f8dec)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15035
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit ba9c5ba8ec54e72d68e3f753a5350afe0fb50a7c)
Creates a file, opens it again on two different connections
and then renames it. When we close and ask for SMB2_CLOSE_FLAGS_FULL_INFORMATION
we expect this to succeed and return valid data on the handles that did not do
the rename request.
This currently succeeds by accident on master, so we are not
adding a knownfail.d/ file here. When we back-port this test
to 4.16.next, 4.15.next we will add a knownfail.d file.
The rename request zeros out the fsp->fsp_name->st field on the handles
that are open but are not being renamed, marking them as INVALID_STAT.
This should not happen on any open handle. Fix to follow will
preserve the field on rename in both the local connection and
different connection case.
Master gets away with this as in this branch, openat_pathref_fsp(),
which we use in the setup_close_full_information() call to fetch
the SMB2_CLOSE_FLAGS_FULL_INFORMATION data doesn't require an
existing VALID_STAT struct in order to open the file. This
hides the fact the rename zeroed out fsp->fsp_name->st.
4.16.x and 4.15.x don't have this fix, so expose the bug.
Regardless, even in master we should not zero out any
fsp->fsp_name->st values on rename.
Add knownfail.d/rename-full-info for 4.16.x, 4.15.x.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15038
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
(Back-ported from commit 1301e6461393601a4d43cfc465a05114e6ae4662)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15038
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 4725ef5c96395dc2f48fab1160a3312d95e21416)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15038
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit e862a2d9ec4e7bec1dd58490e9dee47d543b9154)
This is an implementation of a test written by Apple for their
client. Currently fails to reconnect due to btime being overwritten
incorrectly in the SMB2 setinfo path.
Add knownfail.d/durable-v2-setinfo
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15022
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 0036617a5c76e6003e3c9a5039c325d77d897709)
Verifies async-dosmode sync fallback works with shadow_copy2 which returns
ENOSYS for SMB_VFS_GET_DOS_ATTRIBUTES_SEND().
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14957
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit ffdb1c3e00c233efc99e8f1a66a5f83beb4e07f3)
Checks we return INVALID_PARAMETER when trying to open a
different file with a duplicate lease key on the same share.
Checked against Windows10. Currently fails against smbd
so add knownfail.d/smb2-lease-duplicateopen
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14737
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Mulder <dmulder@suse.com>
(cherry picked from commit ca3896b6f8bbcad68f042720feceedfa29ddbd83)
Checks we return INVALID_PARAMETER when trying to create a
new file with a duplicate lease key on the same share.
Checked against Windows10. Samba already passes this
but we didn't have a test before.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14737
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Mulder <dmulder@suse.com>
(cherry picked from commit bf22548d11fe67ea3f4ec10dff81773d626e4703)
smb2.fileid_unique.fileid_unique
smb2.fileid_unique.fileid_unique-dir
Create 100 files or directories as fast as we can
against a "normal" share, then read info on them
and ensure (a) top bit is set (generated from itime)
and (b) uniqueness across all generated objects
(checks poor timestamp resolution doesn't create
duplicate fileids).
This shows that even on ext4, this is enough to
cause duplicate fileids to be returned.
Add knownfail.d/fileid-unique
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14928
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Christof Schmitt <cs@samba.org>
This demonstrates that an invalid av_pair in NTLMv2_CLIENT_CHALLENGE
should result in NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER at the NTLMSSP layer.
This is different from the netr_LogonSamLogon*() case, where it is
ignored instead.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14932
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Demonstrate that smbd fails FSCTL_QUERY_NETWORK_INTERFACE_INFO
only because the user doesn't have permissions on the share root.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14788
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
An invalid file id for FSCTL_QUERY_NETWORK_INTERFACE_INFO gives
INVALID_PARAMETER instead of FILE_CLOSED.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14788
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
It seems that we currently don't have BUFFER_TOO_SMALL handling
for FSCTL/IOCTL calls.
FSCTL_QUERY_NETWORK_INTERFACE_INFO is just an easy example
to demonstrate it.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14788
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Demonstrate that smbd fails FSCTL_VALIDATE_NEGOTIATE_INFO
only because the user doesn't have permissions on the share root.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14788
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
If we reach 'done' with ret == false without setting
the torture result we get unexpected results e.g.
Exception: Exception: Unknown error/failure. Missing torture_fail() or torture_assert_*() call?
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14760
Signed-off-by: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This test will use a FSCTL_SMBTORTURE_GLOBAL_READ_RESPONSE_BODY_PADDING8
in order to change the server behavior of READ responses regarding
the data offset.
It will demonstrate the problem in smb2cli_read*() triggered
by NetApp Ontap servers.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14607
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This tests all kind of signing/encryption algorithm mismatches
and passes against Windows with GMAC signing support.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Allowing GMAC in future will generate different results, so
make sure the tests keep working as is.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Testing also with a different client guid between channels
triggers (at least in samba) a different code path compaired
to the tests using the same client guid.
Testing both already revealed a bug.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This checks the result of a 2nd session setup without the BIND flags
and also without signing being already enabled.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Missing dependency causes build failure on freebsd.
[2928/3944] Compiling source4/torture/util_smb.c
In file included from ../../source4/torture/util_smb.c:22:
../../lib/cmdline/cmdline.h:22:10: fatal error: 'popt.h' file not found
^~~~~~~~
1 error generated.
Signed-off-by: Amitay Isaacs <amitay@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Jun 22 02:05:17 UTC 2021 on sn-devel-184
The expected DOS attributes are taken from a Windows 2016 server. The expected
timestamps are what Samba has returned before commit 572d4e3a56eef00e29f9348:
NTTIME(0), ie no value.
The upcoming fix will restore this behaviour. Windows of course does
return *some* timestamps, but as it's neither documented nor was I able to
figure out where they would be coming from, as well as the Windows client apparently
doesn't care, I didn't bother with implementing some sophisticated heuristic to
return some timestamps.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14731
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
The server must set all fields to 0 if postqueryattrib is not set.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14714
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
torture_comment calls need a struct torture_context arg,
not its mem_ctx child. Use talloc_parent(). Also
need to call torture_result somewhere on failure.
Signed-off-by: Gordon Ross <gordon.ross@tintri.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Mulder <dmulder@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Apr 22 18:48:30 UTC 2021 on sn-devel-184
This test verifies that if a compound related request is not preceeded by a
request that generates or contains a File-ID, the request fails with
NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This verifies that if the initial create fails with
NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND, compount related operations fail with the same
error.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
We want to verify what Windows does when the first request of the
chain has failed and an async request is part of the chain. We see
Windows fails the async request with the same error. Also the async
request is immediately failed.
Signed-off-by: Anubhav Rakshit <anubhav.rakshit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This test case checks what happens when we have an intermediate request
failure and how it impacts rest of the chain.
Signed-off-by: Anubhav Rakshit <anubhav.rakshit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
We already pass samba3.smb2.compound.related5, but mark related4 as knownfail.
Signed-off-by: Anubhav Rakshit <anubhav.rakshit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This demonstrates that a session and it's open handles is destroyed
when the last explicitly bound channel gets disconnected.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14449
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
These demonstrate that the replay detection for pending opens
either doesn't exist (for the share_access=NONE => SHARING_VIOLATION
case) or return the wrong status code => ACCESS_DENIED instead of
FILE_NOT_AVAILABLE.
Windows clients transparently retry after FILE_NOT_AVAILABLE,
while they pass ACCESS_DENIED directly to the application.
I'll report that to dochelp@microsoft.com in order to
clarify the situation.
In the meantime I added tests with a '-windows' suffix,
which demostrate the current windows server behavior,
while the tests with a '-sane' suffix expect the behavior
that whould make windows clients happy.
For Samba I'll implement the '-sane' behavior that
detects all replays and returns FILE_NOT_AVAILABLE
if the original request is still pending.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14449
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>