IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
* CVE-2023-0614 Not-secret but access controlled LDAP attributes can be discovered (bug 15270)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Redaction may be expensive if we end up needing to fetch a security
descriptor to verify rights to an attribute. Checking the search scope
is probably cheaper, so do that first.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This makes it less likely that we forget to handle a case.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Add a hook, acl_redact_msg_for_filter(), in the aclread module, that
marks inaccessible any message elements used by an LDAP search filter
that the user has no right to access. Make the various ldb_match_*()
functions check whether message elements are accessible, and refuse to
match any that are not. Remaining message elements, not mentioned in the
search filter, are checked in aclread_callback(), and any inaccessible
elements are removed at this point.
Certain attributes, namely objectClass, distinguishedName, name, and
objectGUID, are always present, and hence the presence of said
attributes is always allowed to be checked in a search filter. This
corresponds with the behaviour of Windows.
Further, we unconditionally allow the attributes isDeleted and
isRecycled in a check for presence or equality. Windows is not known to
make this special exception, but it seems mostly harmless, and should
mitigate the performance impact on searches made by the show_deleted
module.
As a result of all these changes, our behaviour regarding confidential
attributes happens to match Windows more closely. For the test in
confidential_attr.py, we can now model our attribute handling with
DC_MODE_RETURN_ALL, which corresponds to the behaviour exhibited by
Windows.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Change all uses of ldb_kv_filter_attrs() to use
ldb_filter_attrs_in_place() instead. This function does less work than
its predecessor, and no longer requires the allocation of a second ldb
message. Some of the work is able to be split out into separate
functions that each accomplish a single task, with a purpose to make the
code clearer.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
ldb_filter_attrs() previously did too much. Now its replacement,
ldb_filter_attrs_in_place(), only does the actual filtering, while
taking ownership of each element's values is handled in a separate
function, ldb_msg_elements_take_ownership().
Also, ldb_filter_attrs_in_place() no longer adds the distinguishedName
to the message if it is missing. That is handled in another function,
ldb_msg_add_distinguished_name().
As we're now modifying the original message rather than copying it into
a new one, we no longer need the filtered_msg parameter.
We adapt a test, based on ldb_filter_attrs_test, to exercise the new
function.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
At present this function is an exact duplicate of ldb_filter_attrs(),
but in the next commit we shall modify it to work in place, without the
need for the allocation of a second message.
The test is a near duplicate of the existing test for
ldb_filter_attrs().
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Many places in Samba depend upon various components of an ldb message
being talloc allocated, and hence able to be used as talloc contexts.
The elements and values of an unpacked ldb message point to unowned data
inside the memory-mapped database, and this function ensures that such
messages have talloc ownership of said elements and values.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Add ldb_filter_attrs_test to the list of tests so that it actually gets
run.
Remove a duplicate ldb_msg_test that was accidentally added in commit
5ca90e758ade97fb5e335029c7a1768094e70564.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
If the value of an ldb message element is not zero-terminated, calling
ldb_msg_find_attr_as_string() will cause the function to read off the
end of the buffer in an attempt to verify that the value is
zero-terminated. This can cause unexpected behaviour and make the test
randomly fail.
To avoid this, we must have a terminating null byte that is *not*
counted as part of the length, and so we must calculate the length with
strlen() rather than sizeof.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
The value can be quite large, the allocation will take much
longer than the actual match and is repeated per candidate
record.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15331
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
(cherry picked from commit cad96f59a08192df927fb1df4e9787c7f70991a2)
[abartlet@samba.org Included in the security release as this
makes the new large_ldap.py timeout test more reliable]
- Build fix for Solaris, after removal
of tevent ports backend (bug #15298)
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15298
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(v4-18-test): Jule Anger <janger@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(v4-18-test): Mon Feb 6 13:55:46 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
* Support python 3.12
* Have python functions operating on DNs raise LdbError
* don't call comparison() directly in LDB_TYPESAFE_QSORT
* Use ldb_ascii_toupper() for case folding to support
tr_TR.UTF-8 and other dotless i locales,
see https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15248
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jule Anger <janger@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15248
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Dec 23 14:17:31 UTC 2022 on sn-devel-184
The result is not used, it is only part of the macro to gain
type-checking.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
These tests are redeclared later and so are never used. Give them new
names so that they will be run again.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
The return codes of these functions are not often checked. Throwing an
exception ensures we won't continue blindly on if DN manipulation fails.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
The failure in question would have to be a `talloc_strdup(dn, "")` in
ldb_dn_from_ldb_val().
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This aims to minimise usage of the error-prone pattern of searching for
a just-added message element in order to make modifications to it (and
potentially finding the wrong element).
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15009
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Currently, there are many places where we use ldb_msg_add_empty() to add
an empty element to a message, and then call ldb_msg_add_value() or
similar to add values to that element. However, this performs an
unnecessary search of the message's elements to locate the new element.
Moreover, if an element with the same attribute name already exists
earlier in the message, the values will be added to that element,
instead of to the intended newly added element.
A similar pattern exists where we add values to a message, and then call
ldb_msg_find_element() to locate that message element and sets its flags
to (e.g.) LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE. This also performs an unnecessary
search, and may locate the wrong message element for setting the flags.
To avoid these problems, add functions for appending a value to a
message, so that a particular value can be added to the end of a message
in a single operation.
For ADD requests, it is important that no two message elements share the
same attribute name, otherwise things will break. (Normally,
ldb_msg_normalize() is called before processing the request to help
ensure this.) Thus, we must be careful not to append an attribute to an
ADD message, unless we are sure (e.g. through ldb_msg_find_element())
that an existing element for that attribute is not present.
These functions will be used in the next commit.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15009
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Using the newly added ldb flag, we can now detect when a message has
been shallow-copied so that its elements share their values with the
original message elements. Then when adding values to the copied
message, we now make a copy of the shared values array first.
This should prevent a use-after-free that occurred in LDB modules when
new values were added to a shallow copy of a message by calling
talloc_realloc() on the original values array, invalidating the 'values'
pointer in the original message element. The original values pointer can
later be used in the database audit logging module which logs database
requests, and potentially cause a crash.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15009
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
When making a shallow copy of an ldb message, mark the message elements
of the copy as sharing their values with the message elements in the
original message.
This flag value will be heeded in the next commit.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15009
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
The LDB filter processing is where the time is spent in the LDB stack
but the timeout event will not get run while this is ongoing, so we
must confirm we have not yet timed out manually.
RN: Ensure that the LDB request has not timed out during filter processing
as the LDAP server MaxQueryDuration is otherwise not honoured.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14694
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
This avoids master having an older or identical LDB version
to Samba 4.15.x while it gains additional changes that may
not all be backported.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Oct 5 19:57:51 UTC 2021 on sn-devel-184
Previously, containment testing using the 'in' operator was handled by
performing an equality comparison between the chosen object and each of
the message's keys in turn. This behaviour was prone to errors due to
not considering differences in case between otherwise equal elements, as
the indexing operations do.
Containment testing should now be more consistent with the indexing
operations and with the get() method of ldb.Message.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14845
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
