IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Such a failure could be caused by situations other than memory errors,
but a simple indication of failure is all that ldb_dn_get_parent() gives
us to work with.
We keep the old behaviour of returning None if the DN has no components,
which an existing test (ldb.python.api.DnTests.test_parent_nonexistent)
expects.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Using Py_CLEAR() ensures that these structures are observed in a
consistent state by any Python code that may run during deconstruction.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Fix the following error observed running samba.test.registry
compiled with clang-17 and UBsan:
lib/ldb/common/ldb_ldif.c:881:9: runtime error: applying non-zero offset 137438953440 to null pointer
#0 0x7faa0eb3932f in ldb_ldif_read lib/ldb/common/ldb_ldif.c:881
#1 0x7faa0eb3aec6 in ldb_ldif_read_string lib/ldb/common/ldb_ldif.c:1004
#2 0x7faa077ed759 in dsdb_set_schema_from_ldif source4/dsdb/schema/schema_set.c:1113
#3 0x7faa068fcbbf in py_dsdb_set_schema_from_ldif source4/dsdb/pydsdb.c:929
#4 0x7faa1d1d4507 in cfunction_call (/lib64/libpython3.11.so.1.0+0x1d4507)
[... a lot of Python calls skipped...]
I.e. number of elements should be checked against zero
before making an attempt to access an element by index.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <dantipov@cloudlinux.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
If we don't check for NULL after each loop iteration, the failure could
be masked in the next iteration by talloc_asprintf_append() allocating
on the NULL context. That could result in values getting lost.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Computing a pointer that points outside of an array, and not to one past
the last element, is undefined behaviour. To avoid this, do our
comparisons in terms of lengths, not pointers.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
If the LDB_UNPACK_DATA_FLAG_NO_ATTRS flag is set, we don't return any
elements, so we should set num_elements accordingly. This ensures
callers don't try to access elements that aren't there.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
That an attribute has been access checked doesn't mean that the user has
the right to view it.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Commit bed9efa6cd introduced
ldb_msg_add_linearized_dn() to replace ldb_msg_add_dn(), but retained
the now-incorrect associated comment. The comment later made its way
into a function added later by commit 'CVE-2022-32746 ldb: Add functions
for appending to an ldb_message'.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15008
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Redaction may be expensive if we end up needing to fetch a security
descriptor to verify rights to an attribute. Checking the search scope
is probably cheaper, so do that first.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This makes it less likely that we forget to handle a case.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Add a hook, acl_redact_msg_for_filter(), in the aclread module, that
marks inaccessible any message elements used by an LDAP search filter
that the user has no right to access. Make the various ldb_match_*()
functions check whether message elements are accessible, and refuse to
match any that are not. Remaining message elements, not mentioned in the
search filter, are checked in aclread_callback(), and any inaccessible
elements are removed at this point.
Certain attributes, namely objectClass, distinguishedName, name, and
objectGUID, are always present, and hence the presence of said
attributes is always allowed to be checked in a search filter. This
corresponds with the behaviour of Windows.
Further, we unconditionally allow the attributes isDeleted and
isRecycled in a check for presence or equality. Windows is not known to
make this special exception, but it seems mostly harmless, and should
mitigate the performance impact on searches made by the show_deleted
module.
As a result of all these changes, our behaviour regarding confidential
attributes happens to match Windows more closely. For the test in
confidential_attr.py, we can now model our attribute handling with
DC_MODE_RETURN_ALL, which corresponds to the behaviour exhibited by
Windows.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Change all uses of ldb_kv_filter_attrs() to use
ldb_filter_attrs_in_place() instead. This function does less work than
its predecessor, and no longer requires the allocation of a second ldb
message. Some of the work is able to be split out into separate
functions that each accomplish a single task, with a purpose to make the
code clearer.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
ldb_filter_attrs() previously did too much. Now its replacement,
ldb_filter_attrs_in_place(), only does the actual filtering, while
taking ownership of each element's values is handled in a separate
function, ldb_msg_elements_take_ownership().
Also, ldb_filter_attrs_in_place() no longer adds the distinguishedName
to the message if it is missing. That is handled in another function,
ldb_msg_add_distinguished_name().
As we're now modifying the original message rather than copying it into
a new one, we no longer need the filtered_msg parameter.
We adapt a test, based on ldb_filter_attrs_test, to exercise the new
function.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
At present this function is an exact duplicate of ldb_filter_attrs(),
but in the next commit we shall modify it to work in place, without the
need for the allocation of a second message.
The test is a near duplicate of the existing test for
ldb_filter_attrs().
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Many places in Samba depend upon various components of an ldb message
being talloc allocated, and hence able to be used as talloc contexts.
The elements and values of an unpacked ldb message point to unowned data
inside the memory-mapped database, and this function ensures that such
messages have talloc ownership of said elements and values.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Add ldb_filter_attrs_test to the list of tests so that it actually gets
run.
Remove a duplicate ldb_msg_test that was accidentally added in commit
5ca90e758a.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
If the value of an ldb message element is not zero-terminated, calling
ldb_msg_find_attr_as_string() will cause the function to read off the
end of the buffer in an attempt to verify that the value is
zero-terminated. This can cause unexpected behaviour and make the test
randomly fail.
To avoid this, we must have a terminating null byte that is *not*
counted as part of the length, and so we must calculate the length with
strlen() rather than sizeof.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15270
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Best reviewed with: `git show --word-diff`.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Apr 4 08:30:28 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
These functions allow us to parse any value of a message element, not
only the first. They also unambiguously indicate whether an error has
occurred.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Mar 30 08:08:32 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
We don't allow MODRDN and DELETE for now as they
don't work as is anyway. We'll add these in the next steps.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This is needed in order to process schema updates.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We should only do this in the LDB_ERR_NO_SUCH_ATTRIBUTE case.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This is a change in cmocka to avoid hiding possible errors.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Mar 15 07:53:54 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
The value can be quite large, the allocation will take much
longer than the actual match and is repeated per candidate
record.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15331
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Feb 15 09:05:56 UTC 2023 on atb-devel-224
