IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
* changed the behavior of winbind_ads.c:trusted_domains() to not overwrite
existing trust information if we're joined to a child domain, and querying the
forest root domain. Previously if we were joined to a child domain, we'd
request all known trust information from this child domain (our primary domain)
and store it in the tdc. We'd then request all trust information from our tree
root (to get the forests we transitively trust) and overwrite the existing trust
information we already had from the perspective of the tree root.
* updated several comments and fixed typos
(This used to be commit 6aac972d79)
This patch make sure we do not try to contact smbd in the main dameon
to avoid deadlocks.
All the operations that require connecting to smbd are performed in
the domain child anyway.
(This used to be commit 9347d34b50)
Use the flags stored in the tdb when determining if a domain can
be contacted. The tdb should be considered authoratative anyways unless
you know the flags in the winbindd_domain are correct (such as when
first enumerating trusts).
Original suggestion and patch from Steven Danneman <steven.danneman@isilon.com>.
Manually rewritten by me for 3.2.
(This used to be commit f53658a20d)
The check for inbound trusts is invalid when samba is a DC
and has a trust with an active directory domain.
This effectively prevented tusts with an AD domain on a
samba DC from working (unless using "winbindd rpc only"),
because an ads_connect() was never performed. Only the
rpc-based winbindd methods were working properly.
Jerry: Please check!
Michael
(This used to be commit dcd42a1e06)
The present assignment
"request->data.init_conn.is_primary = domain->internal ? False : True"
simply feels wrong. This seems to be the thing right to do:
"request->data.init_conn.is_primary = domain->primary ? true : false".
The question is: Does this have any purpose at all?
data.init_conn.is_primary seems to be used nowhere
in the whole code at all.
Is it (still) needed?
Michael
(This used to be commit 8bb21b8b38)
Also *do not* clear the trust list when rescanning or else it is possible
to suffer from a race condition where no trusted domains can be found.
(This used to be commit e7164a252b)
to struct sockaddr_storage in most places that matter (ie.
not the nmbd and NetBIOS lookups). This passes make test
on an IPv4 box, but I'll have to do more work/testing on
IPv6 enabled boxes. This should now give us a framework
for testing and finishing the IPv6 migration. It's at
the state where someone with a working IPv6 setup should
(theorecically) be able to type :
smbclient //ipv6-address/share
and have it work.
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit 98e154c312)
bugs in various places whilst doing this (places that assumed
BOOL == int). I also need to fix the Samba4 pidl generation
(next checkin).
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit f35a266b3c)
Now BUILTIN is always the first domain followed
by the domain of our own SAM DB and the primary
domain (in member server mode).
metze
(This used to be commit b8d67b78aa)
