IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Kai Blin <kai@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Oct 14 23:05:54 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
This is necessary to allow talloc pools to be objects on their own. It
is an incompatible change in the sense that talloc_get_size(pool) now
returns 0 instead of the pool size. When the talloc_pooled_object()
call is added, this will start to make sense again.
Maybe we should add a talloc_pool_size call? Or is that overkill?
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This is a preparation to make talloc pool real objects themselves.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This will allow to exchange the extra talloc pool header with the
talloc_chunk structure
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
If we want nested pools, we will have pools that are pool members. So
we will have to have a separate "next object" pointer for pools. As
we have struct talloc_pool_chunk now, this additional pointer does not
affect normal talloc objects.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
bin/smbtorture //127.0.0.1 local.talloc now runs with no valgrind errors.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: "Stefan (metze) Metzmacher" <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Aug 28 02:44:17 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
Replace the last use of talloc_memlimit_update() with talloc_memlimit_grow()/
talloc_memlimit_shrink().
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Simo Sorce <idra@samba.org>
Don't check the memlimit if the allocation was successful from a pool. We already
checked the memory limit when we created the pool.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Simo Sorce <idra@samba.org>
Add the functions:
talloc_memlimit_grow(), talloc_memlimit_shrink(),
talloc_memlimit_update_on_free().
as replacements for talloc_memlimit_update().
The interface to talloc_memlimit_update() is very
hard to understand and use. The above functions
are (to me) much clearer.
The goal of these changes is to only update
the memlimits on malloc/free/realloc, not
on every pool allocation. That way we only
count pool creation as allocation from any
imposed limits, not allocation from an already
created pool.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Simo Sorce <idra@samba.org>
We are now confident that that waf build system meets enough of our needs
that we will work to improve it, rather than maintain two build systems.
Andrew Bartlett
Reviewed-by: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Kai Blin <kai@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Kai Blin <kai@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon May 20 18:48:49 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
The compat library is already only built in standalone build,
so we need the configure option also only in the standalone build.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Early returns are easier to understand than "else if"
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Apr 18 22:50:42 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
This will avoid 'surprise returns' and makes the code cleare to readers.
These macros were complex enough to warrant a full function anyway not
just for readability but also for debuggability.
Thanks David for pointing out this issue.
Autobuild-User(master): Simo Sorce <idra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Oct 5 23:24:17 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
By calling talloc_set_memlimit() we can now set a max memory limit
for a whole talloc hierarchy.
ANy attempt to allocate memory beyond the max allowed for the whole
hierarchy wil cause an allocation failure.
Stealing memory correctly accounts for used memory in the old and the new
hierarchy but exceeding the memory limit in the new parent will not cause
a failure.
We explicitly call free() on a pool which falls to zero, assuming it's
not inside another pool (we crash). Check on creation and explicitly
document this case.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
This neatens the code a bit (we should do a similar thing for all the
TALLOC_CHUNK macros).
Two subtler changes:
(1) As a result of the struct, we actually pack object_count into the
talloc header on 32-bit platforms (since the header is 40 bytes, but
needs to be 16-byte aligned).
(2) I avoid VALGRIND_MAKE_MEM_UNDEFINED on memmove when we resize the
only entry in a pool; that's done later anyway.
With -O2 on my 11.04 Ubuntu 32-bit x86 laptop, the talloc_pool speed as
measured by testsuite.c actually increases 10%.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
These now use waf dist, and the script/librelease.sh script as a wrapper.
The mksyms.sh call in the source3/Makefile uses the copy in source3/script
Andrew Bartlett
