IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This allows potentially NULL pointers to be referenced, without an if ()
for every use. (previously, it would segfault).
Update doco, and allow talloc_unlink to match.
Andrew Bartlett
(This used to be commit 59757c7f9d)
The main change is to get rid of talloc_parent_chunk() from all
commonly used code paths, so talloc_free() is now O(1) again. It was
originally O(1), but the last round of changes broke that.
Also some documentation updates
(This used to be commit d4fe21cdb9)
so talloc now doesn't contain any ldb specific functions.
allow NULL to be passed to a couple more talloc() functions
(This used to be commit 1246f80d80)
which is much clearer and simpler to use. It removes a specific parent
from a pointer, no matter whether that parent is a "reference" or a
direct parent. This gives complete control over the free process.
(This used to be commit 6c563887f1)
the % coverage in terms of lines of code of a test suite. I thought a
good first place to start with gcov was the talloc test suite. When I
started the test suite covered about 60% of all lines of code in
talloc.c, and now it covers about 99%. The only lines not covered are
talloc corruption errors, as that would cause smb_panic() to fire.
It will be interesting to try gcov on the main Samba test suite for
smbd. We won't achieve 100% coverage, but it would be nice to get to
90% or more.
I also modified the talloc.c sources to be able to be build standalone, using:
gcc -c -D_STANDALONE_ -Iinlcude lib/talloc.c
that should make it much easier to re-use talloc in other projects
(This used to be commit 8d4dc99b82)
told me he found the description confusing, and given that some of it
was not correct I am not surprised!
added some more docs on the reporting calls
(This used to be commit 43079cfc80)
- added documentation for talloc_unreference()
- made the abandoned child logic in talloc_free() clearer and more consistent
(This used to be commit a87584c8e3)
