IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
you're passing a BOOL parameter, don't use "clever"
code in while statement - make things easier and
clearer to understand when triggering something
with an if.
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit b1fc2d8b99)
Added a next_token_no_ltrim() function which does not strip leading separator
characters. The new function is used only where really necessary, even though
it could reasonably be used in many more places, to avoid superfluous code
changes.
Derrell
(This used to be commit d90061aa93)
Although I've never met a computer or compiler that produced pointers to
functions which are a different size than pointers to data, I suppose they
probably exist. Assigning a pointer to a function is technically illegal in C
anyway.
Change casts of the option_value based on the option_name to use of variable
argument lists.
For binary compatibility, I've maintained but deprecated the old behavior of
debug_stderr (which expected to be passed a NULL or non-NULL pointer) and
added a new option debug_to_stderr which properly expects a boolean (int)
parameter.
Derrell
(This used to be commit c1b4c51053)
being deleted when hide unreadable set to true.
Here's the scoop.
This one is really interesting. The pattern of deleting a directory is to do a
findfirst to get the first part of the list, then for each name returned it
does a open/set delete on close/close -> thus deleting the file. Then it does a
findnext with the last file name THAT IT JUST DELETED ! Now we can handle this
in the findnext in the case where hide unreadable is set to false as we look
back in our cache of names and just seek to the right point. The bug is
actually fixed in the first hunk of this patch - the one that removes the
is_visible_file() check after SearchDir returns false. We don't actually need
it and in this case it's causing the delete to be aborted because it can't find
the name (doh ! it was just deleted). We don't need it as SearchDir is only
ever called from findnext, and findnext should only ever be returning names we
gave it.
The rest of the patch are the debugs I used to find
the problem but they're generically useful.
Phew - that one took a while to track down.....
Jerry, please merge for 3.0.23 final.
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit cd048cb775)
When trying to login using krb5 with a trusted domain account, we
need to make sure that our and the remote domain are AD.
Guenther
(This used to be commit 5853525f11)
cannot put saf_name in the failed conn cache as it's uninitialized.
Store saf_servername (the ip) in that case.
Volker, please check.
Guenther
(This used to be commit 098a87f492)
Add missing automatic add of the Administrators SID in the absence
of winbindd and precense of Domain Admins SID in the user's token.
(This used to be commit ce7846d6f1)
share_mode struct. Allows us to know the unix
uid of the opener of the file/directory. Needed
for info level queries on open files.
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit d929323d6f)
examining Klockwork #1519. get_printer_subkeys()
could return zero without initializing it's return
pointer arg. Fixed this. Added free of subkey pointer
return in registry/reg_printing.c (interesting that
neithe Coverity or Klocwork found this one).
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit 4fbeae1a3a)
1177
In reg_perfcount.c: 1200 1202 1203 1204
In regfio.c: 1243 1245 1246 1247 1251
Jerry, the reg_perfcount and regfio.c ones, can you take a look please? This
is really your code, and I'm not sure I did the right thing to return an
error.
smbcacls.c: 1377
srv_eventlog_nt.c: 1415 1416 1417
srv_lsa_nt.c: 1420 1421
srv_netlog_nt.c: 1429
srv_samr_nt: 1458 1459 1460
Volker
Volker
(This used to be commit d6547d12b1)
logic in smbd/process.c. All interested (Volker,
Jerry, James etc). PLEASE REVIEW THIS CHANGE.
The logic should be identical but *much* easier
to follow and change (and shouldn't confuse Klockwork :-).
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit d357f8b335)
