IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This removes conversions to and from the source3 varient of the
server_info structure when replaced in s3compat, and presents a tidier
interface to winbindd in any case.
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Andrew Tridgell <tridge@samba.org>
This common structure will make it much easier to produce an auth
module for s3compat that calls Samba4's auth subsystem.
In order the make the link work properly (and not map twice), we mark
both that we did try and map the user, as well as if we changed the
user during the mapping.
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Andrew Tridgell <tridge@samba.org>
This matches the structure that new code is being written to,
and removes one more of the old-style named structures, and
the need to know that is is just an alias for struct dom_sid.
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
All the callers just want the PAC_LOGON_INFO, so search for that in
ads_verify_ticket(), and don't bother the callers with the rest of the
PAC.
This change makes sense on it's own (removing boilerplate wrappers
that just confuse the code), but it also makes it much easier to
implement a matching ads_verify_ticket() function in Samba4 for the
s3compat proposal.
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
This shrinks include/includes.h.gch by the size of 7 MB and reduces build time
as follows:
ccache build w/o patch
real 4m21.529s
ccache build with patch
real 3m6.402s
pch build w/o patch
real 4m26.318s
pch build with patch
real 3m6.932s
Guenther
We're in a child, the parent already has chosen the domain by
picking the right child to connect to.
Metze, you've done work on winbind lately, so it goes to you:
Please check :-)
At the formerly used process_result statement we have alone one
NT_STATUS_IS_OK() which never could be hit in our case as we only go here
if NT_STATUS_EQUAL is not ok.
