IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
From notify_internal.c:
/*
* The notify database is split up into two databases: One
* relatively static index db and the real notify db with the
* volatile entries.
*/
This change is necessary to make notify scale better in a cluster
This is clearly a utiliy function generic to gensec. Also the 3 callers
had identical implementations. Provide a generic implementation for all
of them and avoid duplicating the code everywhere.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
gensec_update() ensures that DCE-style and sign/seal are negotiated correctly
for DCE/RPC pipes. Also, the smb sealing client/server already check for the
gensec_have_feature().
This additional check just keeps causing trouble, and is 'protecting'
an already secure negoitated exchange.
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Thu Feb 16 21:19:44 CET 2012 on sn-devel-104
This ensures that we use the same SPNEGO code on session setup and on
DCE/RPC binds, and simplfies the calling code as spnego is no longer
a special case in cli_pipe.c
A special case wrapper function remains to avoid changing the
application layer callers in this patch.
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Using gss_krb5_export_lucid_sec_context() is a problem with MIT krb5, as
it (reasonably, I suppose) invalidates the gssapi context on which it
is called. Instead, we look to the type of session key which is
negotiated, and see if it not AES (or newer).
If we negotiated AES or newer, then we set GENSEC_FEATURE_NEW_SPENGO
so that we know to generate valid mechListMic values in SPNEGO.
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This matches the behavior of ads_verify_ticket().
Note that ads_verify_ticket() calls krb5_to_nt_status(), but
as a server it's likely to always returns NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL.
ads_verify_ticket() maps NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL to NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE.
metze
Autobuild-User: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Thu Jan 26 10:48:36 CET 2012 on sn-devel-104
The validation of the mutual authentication reply produces no further
data to send to the server.
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
The NT_STATUS_MORE_PROCESSING_REQUIRED status code is what gensec
is expecting in any case.
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
The GSE layer is now used via the GENSEC module, so we do not need these
functions exposed any more.
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This simplifies a lot of code, as we know we are always dealing
with a struct gensec_security, and allows the gensec module being
used to implement GSSAPI to be swapped for AD-server operation.
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This simplifies a lot of code, as we know we are always dealing with a
struct gensec_security, and allows the gensec module being used to
implement GSSAPI to be swapped when required for AD-server operation.
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
