IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Cope with the minor difference in wildcard search return when
we're actually using SMB1+POSIX on the server (SMB1+POSIX treats
all directory search paths as wildcards).
Remove the following entries in knownfail.d/posix_infolevel_fails.
samba3.unix.info2.info2\(nt4_dc_smb1\)
samba3.unix.info2.info2\(ad_dc_smb1\)
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Remove the following entry in knownfail.d/posix_infolevel_fails.
^samba3.raw.search.one\ file\ search.*
from knownfail.d/posix_infolevel_fails
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Change from torture_suite_add_1smb_test() to torture_suite_add_2smb_test().
Not yet used. We will need this to do SMB1+POSIX search calls on
a connection on which we have negotiated SMB1+POSIX.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
We'll soon be using this under SMB1+POSIX and neither Windows or POSIX
need a leading '\\' (and SMB1+POSIX sees the '\\' as part of the name).
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
This is pre WindowXP SMB1 functionality, and we
need to remove this from the server in order to
move towards SMB2-only, so the test must go.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
This is pre WindowXP SMB1 functionality, and we
need to remove this from the server in order to
move towards SMB2-only, so the test must go.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
The client-side testing done by these callbacks is no longer needed, and
the server-side testing is covered by Python-based tests. Removing these
leaves us with a more manageable test of the Kerberos API.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This test combination is not needed. Removing it allows us to avoid
modifying requests prior to sending them, which can cause problems with
an upgraded Heimdal version.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Dec 6 22:57:54 UTC 2021 on sn-devel-184
This behaviour is already covered by existing Python tests. This test
stage also modifies the request prior to sending it, which can cause
problems with an upgraded Heimdal version.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Demonstrate that smbd fails FSCTL_QUERY_NETWORK_INTERFACE_INFO
only because the user doesn't have permissions on the share root.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14788
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
An invalid file id for FSCTL_QUERY_NETWORK_INTERFACE_INFO gives
INVALID_PARAMETER instead of FILE_CLOSED.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14788
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
It seems that we currently don't have BUFFER_TOO_SMALL handling
for FSCTL/IOCTL calls.
FSCTL_QUERY_NETWORK_INTERFACE_INFO is just an easy example
to demonstrate it.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14788
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Demonstrate that smbd fails FSCTL_VALIDATE_NEGOTIATE_INFO
only because the user doesn't have permissions on the share root.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14788
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
We should try to route everything through libwbclient.so, because we'll
soon don't have a single library providing winbindd_request_response().
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14780
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
This reverts commit fa4c9bcefdeed0a7106aab84df20b02435febc1f.
We should not be generating these additional PAC buffers for service
tickets, only for TGTs.
Signed-off-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This adds a reproducer for an invalid memory access, when
using the context handle from DsBind across multiple connections
within an association group.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14468
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This will be used in the next commits.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14468
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We want to use the credentials of the joined dc account
in future tests.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14468
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This is not strictly needed, but makes it easier to audit
that we don't miss important places.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14556
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
For detailed knownfail on subtests we need torture_assert() calls
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14828
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Ralph Böhme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Sep 10 16:02:10 UTC 2021 on sn-devel-184
If we reach 'done' with ret == false without setting
the torture result we get unexpected results e.g.
Exception: Exception: Unknown error/failure. Missing torture_fail() or torture_assert_*() call?
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14760
Signed-off-by: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Aug 3 10:18:26 UTC 2021 on sn-devel-184
This test will use a FSCTL_SMBTORTURE_GLOBAL_READ_RESPONSE_BODY_PADDING8
in order to change the server behavior of READ responses regarding
the data offset.
It will demonstrate the problem in smb2cli_read*() triggered
by NetApp Ontap servers.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14607
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This tests all kind of signing/encryption algorithm mismatches
and passes against Windows with GMAC signing support.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Allowing GMAC in future will generate different results, so
make sure the tests keep working as is.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Testing also with a different client guid between channels
triggers (at least in samba) a different code path compaired
to the tests using the same client guid.
Testing both already revealed a bug.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
