IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
msDS-KeyCredentialLink/msDS-KeyCredentialLink-BL are defined as linked attribute pair,
but msDS-KeyCredentialLink-BL is not defined as allowed on any object class definition,
still it's possible to create msDS-KeyCredentialLink attributes.
msDS-KeyPrincipal/msDS-KeyPrincipalBL are also defined as linked attribute pair
and msDS-KeyPrincipalBL is only allowed on object class 'user', but it's possible
to create msDS-KeyPrincipal values pointing to non 'user' objects.
The result is that 'user' objects have a visible msDS-KeyPrincipalBL, but
the others don't have msDS-KeyPrincipalBL visible, by default.
The backlinks are always visible if the backlink attributes are
explicitly requested.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12967
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
The tests don't require an organizationalUnit as parent object
and it makes it possible to create msDS-KeyCredential objects
within the container in the next step.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12967
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob van der Linde <rob@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>
This is easier to reason with regarding which cases should work
and which cases should fail, avoiding issues where more success
than expected would be OK because a self.fail() was missed in a
try: block.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
This made Python 2's print behave like Python 3's print().
In some cases, where we had:
from __future__ import print_function
"""Intended module documentation..."""
this will have the side effect of making the intended module documentation
work as the actual module documentation (i.e. becoming __doc__), because
it is once again the first statement in the module.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This type of object was not possible to delete in Samba without first removing
the link.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14306
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Joe Guo <joeg@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Joe Guo <joeg@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Joe Guo <joeg@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Joe Guo <joeg@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
In py3, iterxxx methods are removed.
Signed-off-by: Joe Guo <joeg@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
In addition to converting the except line another line is also added
for each except to extract the tuple contents.
Signed-off-by: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Oct 26 05:36:11 CEST 2017 on sn-devel-144
The logic involved in asserting that a function raises an LdbError with
a particular error value has shown itself to be too complicated for me
to repeat too often.
To test this function, you would want a put a test in a bit like this:
def test_assertRaisesLdbError(self):
for i in [1, 2, ldb.ERR_ENTRY_ALREADY_EXISTS, 999]:
def f(*args, **kwargs):
raise ldb.LdbError(i, 'msg %s' % i)
self.assertRaisesLdbError(i, 'a message', f, 'la la', la='la')
def f2(*args, **kwargs):
raise ldb.LdbError(i + 1, 'msg %s' % i)
def f3(*args, **kwargs):
pass
for f in (f2, f3):
try:
self.assertRaisesLdbError(i, 'a message', f, 'la la', la='la')
except AssertionError as e:
print i, e, f
pass
else:
print i, f
self.fail('assertRaisesLdbError() failed to fail!')
..but a self-testing test-tester is getting a too meta to run in every
autobuild.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We were ensuring that when we got an LdbError it was the right type,
but we weren't ensuring we got one at all.
The new test doesn't fail.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We can't remove the same thing twice in the same message.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We should not be able to introduce duplicate links using MOD_REPLACE.
It turns out we could and weren't testing.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13095
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Previously we have only added linked attributes using a modify.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Pair-programmed-with: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We had a theory this caused problems. It didn't, but the tests are
still worthwhile.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This isn't functionally different[1] from the previous use of set(),
but it makes the error output easier to read.
[1] OK, it will also show duplicates, which we really don't expect and
would definitely want to see.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We don't test for sort order because we don't depend on it. So this
test was never used.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Tested against Win2012R2. The deactivated link control has no effect on either
one way links or pseudo ones (only two-way ones presumably).
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Note that this test will not work properly across ldap as the
marked-deleted linked attributes will not appear.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
