IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Found by AddressSanitizer
Change-Id: I82e35aea60726053c79510ba8ed3eedfaf553eb7
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Patou <mat@matws.net>
Autobuild-User(master): Matthieu Patou <mat@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Oct 13 08:28:15 CEST 2014 on sn-devel-104
In an error return we have
/* Back it out, if it fails on one */
for (i--; i >= 0; i--) {
ldb_next_del_trans(data->partitions[i]->module);
}
With unsigned int i this will spin and del_trans somewhere far off :-)
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
%a format conversion is a GNU extension, use the more portable %m.
It's at least in SUSv4, supported by glibc since 2.7 and FreeBSD 10.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Oct 9 22:05:26 CEST 2014 on sn-devel-104
This tries to ensure we get enough information to debug this
intermittent failure.
I think this may be a real failure, but it is hard to tell without more info.
This patch prints out the full details of what the domain returned before
doing the assertions.
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
We want to test that the write did update the write time immediately.
We check this by getting the file info in a loop for a few seconds.
There are several result cases:
- the server updated the write time immediately - success
- the server updated the write time, but not immediately - failure
- the server did not update the write time - failure
The loop is only there to be able to discern between the two
failure cases. The check for success is whether the first
getinfo has reportet the updated write time.
The potential for false failures was the additional timing check.
So if the first fileinfo call just took too long (e.g. due to a
busy system), this was reported as failure.
This patch should eliminate interemittent autobuild failures.
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We can hence replace the assert after the loop by a success torture_comment.
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This does not change the logic except for adding early
returns in failure cases.
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We want to test that the write did update the write time immediately.
We check this by getting the file info in a loop for a few seconds.
There are several result cases:
- the server updated the write time immediately - success
- the server updated the write time, but not immediately - failure
- the server did not update the write time - failure
The loop is only there to be able to discern between the two
failure cases. The check for success is whether the first
getinfo has reportet the updated write time.
The potential for false failures was the additional timing check.
So if the first fileinfo call just took too long (e.g. due to a
busy system), this was reported as failure.
This patch should eliminate interemittent autobuild failures.
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We can hence replace the assert after the loop by a success torture_comment.
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This does not change the logic except for adding early
returns in failure cases.
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We want to test that the write did update the write time immediately.
We check this by getting the file info in a loop for a few seconds.
There are several result cases:
- the server updated the write time immediately - success
- the server updated the write time, but not immediately - failure
- the server did not update the write time - failure
The loop is only there to be able to discern between the two
failure cases. The check for success is whether the first
getinfo has reportet the updated write time.
The potential for false failures was the additional timing check.
So if the first fileinfo call just took too long (e.g. due to a
busy system), this was reported as failure.
This patch should eliminate interemittent autobuild failures.
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We can hence replace the assert after the loop by a success torture_comment.
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This does not change the logic except for adding early
returns in failure cases.
But it makes the code more compact and obvious.
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We want to test that the write did update the write time immediately.
We check this by getting the file info in a loop for a few seconds.
There are several result cases:
- the server updated the write time immediately - success
- the server updated the write time, but not immediately - failure
- the server did not update the write time - failure
The loop is only there to be able to discern between the two
failure cases. The check for success is whether the first
getinfo has reportet the updated write time.
The potential for false failures was the additional timing check.
So if the first fileinfo call just took too long (e.g. due to a
busy system), this was reported as failure.
This patch should eliminate interemittent autobuild failures.
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We can hence replace the assert after the loop by a success torture_comment.
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
We know what realm we need to contact, so avoid trying to correctly get a referral from our KDC.
Andrew Bartlett
Change-Id: I154ff72f3176d581b64e0c67d4a9c5f1f76b7924
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Sep 30 14:58:50 CEST 2014 on sn-devel-104
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Sep 27 22:09:29 CEST 2014 on sn-devel-104
