IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
with some subsequent tidy-ups for style.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
If the failure is not on the last component, we would have
TALLOC_FREE()ed some components that we hadn't set.
I think in all pathways we initialise the unset components to zero,
but we should be careful just in case.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
The index code (lib/ldb_key_value/ldb_kv_index.c) recapitulates LDB
expression logic, and it seemed less than completely obvious that it
would never make a mistake and return a different result than an
unindexed search.
Here we run the same search on an unindexed database and on some that
have been indexed with a variety of options. We assert that the
results are identical over a number of searches.
By default, when run from the command line, that number is 495161,
which takes a couple of minutes. But if the SKIP_SLOW_TESTS
environment variable is set, the number is 33569, which takes 20
seconds or so. In selftest we set the variable and run the smaller
number.
The tests will print the cumulative search time for each database for
each testsuite, like this:
$ python3 lib/ldb/tests/python/index_transparency.py
..........................................................[...]
<class '__main__.SearchTest'>
25.78186821937561 <ldb connection tdb:///tmp/tmpf1x72x7l/tdb-indexed-dn.ldb>
17.73349642753601 <ldb connection tdb:///tmp/tmpf1x72x7l/tdb-half-indexed.ldb>
15.14864206314087 <ldb connection tdb:///tmp/tmpf1x72x7l/tdb-indexed-guid.ldb>
13.107165575027466 <ldb connection mdb:///tmp/tmpf1x72x7l/mdb-indexed.ldb>
Like all benchmarks it is interesting but misleading. One caveat here
is that you have (probably) compiled tdb in developer mode without
optimisation, while lmdb is probably a system package compiled with -O2,
though perhaps not tuned to your exact architecture.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
file_modtime() returns errno, so we can skip the racy file_exist()
call.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
Doesn't really matter for tests, but I just came across it.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Klausner <wiz@gatalith.at>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Nov 11 16:47:46 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
Allow "net ads join" in environments where UDP/389 is blocked. Code
will follow.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
This was not used consistently across all of our code base, and I
don't see a reason why this should ever not be port 389.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Otherwise setresuid and friends don't get detected on GNU/Hurd because the
inclusion of <grp.h> is missing for the declaration of setgroups.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Nov 11 12:51:17 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
Add commentary to link commit 86c7688 (MR !3447) to the upstream
fix for ICU-22610 in case there is subsequent breakage.
Signed-off-by: Earl Chew <earl_chew@yahoo.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Nov 8 00:20:38 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
By default enabled on non-clustered Samba, disabled on clustered Samba, the
reason being the expected additional load caused by forcing strict rename to be
enabled.
Signed-off-by: Ralph Boehme <slow@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Maybe Coverity understands that talloc_realloc re-allocates the input
buf. It does not understand that talloc_realloc_size does it.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
Sometime proxy dns servers mess up the case of parts of the
name...
So we should match with strequal() instead of strcmp(),
which results in much less dns packets on the wire...
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Sep 29 08:09:46 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
Autobuild-User(master): Martin Schwenke <martins@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Sep 28 01:20:01 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
We want to avoid that the optimizer will use stack allocations. This way
the test should be a bit more realistic.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
If the speed test gets optimized, the malloc() and free() might be
replaced by stack allocations.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Schwenke <martin@meltin.net>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15643
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Sep 27 09:06:43 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
It should be off by default, as this is not needed by default. It
crashes named on startup, if bind is built with jemalloc support.
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15643
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
We should build with lmdb support also if it is not in AD case. The lmdb
backend is also used e.g. by sssd.
If you don't want to build it, you can always specify --without-ldb-lmdb
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15721
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Autobuild-User(master): Andreas Schneider <asn@cryptomilk.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Sep 25 05:36:13 UTC 2024 on atb-devel-224
