IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Signed-off-by: Joe Guo <joeg@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Joe Guo <joeg@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Joe Guo <joeg@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Joe Guo <joeg@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Noel Power <noel.power@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13031
Signed-off-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
We fail on these ones, and it isn't immediately obvious why. Windows
also fails on *most* of them, but succeeds on "::ffff:0:0" which is a
bit strange but there you go.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Pair-programmed-with: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Dec 24 07:16:25 CET 2015 on sn-devel-144
A subnet name needs to be a valid CIDR address range -- that's the
ones that look like 10.9.8.0/22, where the number after the /
determines how many bits are in the address suffix. It can be IPv4 or
IPv6. There are a few odd constraints (see MS-ADTS v20150630
6.1.1.2.2.2.1 "Subnet Object") -- for example, with IPv4, the implied
bit mask can't equal the address. That is, you can't have a subnet
named "255.255.255.0/24" in a Windows subnet. This rule does not apply
to IPv6.
Windows and Samba both make some ensure that subnets have a unique
valid name, though unfortunately Windows 2008R2 is rather slack when
it comes to IPv6. We follow Windows 2012R2, which roughly follows
RFC5952 -- with one caveat: Windows will allow an address like
"::ffff:0:1:2", which translates to the IPv4 address "0.1.0.2" using
the SIIT translation scheme, and which inet_ntop() would render as
"::ffff:0:0.1.0.2". In the Samba implementation we use an inet_pton()/
inet_ntop() round-trip to establish canonicality, so these addresses
fail. Windows wisely does not allow the SIIT style addresses (the
acronym is widely agreed to be off-by-one in the second letter), and
it will regard "::ffff:0:1:2" as simply "::ffff:0:1:2" and allow it.
We would like to do that too.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
This allows you to add, remove, or shift subnets.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
These are atomic anyway.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
The delete test deleted the site made by the create test, which worked
because "delete" sorts after "create" alphabetically. By themselves,
"delete" would fail and "create" would neglect its duty to clean up.
This would be an issue if the order of tests changes, if one of the
tests is not run, or if another test appears in between. Everything is
fine if they give up the pretense of independence.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Garming Sam <garming@catalyst.net.nz>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
